Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs MTUM: how they differ

CGDV and MTUM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDVOnly in MTUM
Microsoft Corp 5.81%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.39%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66%MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.20%
Broadcom Inc 5.16%INTEL CORPORATION 4.14%
Alphabet Inc 3.60%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.48%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.38%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%SANDISK 3.10%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.87%
General Electric Co 3.08%ALPHABET CLASS A 2.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

CGDV and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapital GroupiShares
What it isDividend ValueMSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+21.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts+4.3 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50091.0%98.2%
Holdings53128

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 128 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or MTUM?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or MTUM?
CGDV charges 0.33% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 98% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against MTUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against MTUM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-mtum Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources