Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GSLC vs MGC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GSLC returned +13.3% to MGC's +13.9%; 65% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GSLC and MGC

Net assets: $15.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF, and $10.1bn on Oct 31, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap ETF.

At a glance
+13.3%
GSLC total return, 1 year
+13.9%
MGC total return, 1 year
0.09%
GSLC expense ratio
0.05%
MGC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MGC costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points.

GSLC vs MGC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGSLCMGC
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.3%+13.9%
Benchmark
What it tracksGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity IndexMorningstar US Mega Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.05%
Net assets, GSLC as of Nov 3, 2026 and MGC as of Oct 31, 2026$15.3bn$10.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common65%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.2%46.8%

Method

Risk and return

Oct 2, 2015 to Oct 30, 2026 · 578 weekly returns
GSLC MGC
Return
Total return edge MGC +327.4% +398.7%
Annualized edge MGC +14.0% +15.6%
Price return edge MGC +263.1% +317.2%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 16.7% 16.9%
Max drawdown edge MGC (slight) −31.8% −31.0%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MGC (slight) 0.73 0.81
Sortino edge MGC (slight) 1.05 1.17
Calmar edge MGC 0.44 0.50
Reading

From Oct 2015 to Oct 2026, MGC returned more: +398.7% to +327.4%. GSLC and MGC swung about the same: 16.7% and 16.9%. MGC fell slightly less at its worst: −31.0% to −31.8%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GSLC vs MGC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGSLCMGCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+327.4%+398.7%MGCPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.0%+15.6%MGCTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+263.1%+317.2%MGCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.7%16.9%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.6%11.6%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.8%−31.0%MGC (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.81MGC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.051.17MGC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.440.50MGCAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 578 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

65%

By the books each fund has filed, GSLC and MGC hold 65% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

65% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GSLC MGC
NVIDIA CORP 8.02% 9.63%
APPLE INC 6.96% 8.95%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.32% 7.01%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.52% 4.45%
ALPHABET INC 2.87% 3.71%
BROADCOM INC 2.32% 3.08%
META PLATFORMS INC 1.86% 2.94%
ALPHABET INC 1.79% 2.95%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 1.26% 1.62%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.24% 2.21%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 1.22% 1.80%
TESLA INC 1.03% 1.84%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GSLC
ATLASSIAN CORP 0.56%
VERISIGN INC 0.41%
W.W. GRAINGER INC 0.39%
NATERA INC 0.37%
STATE STREET CORP 0.37%
FASTENAL COMPANY 0.32%
VALERO ENERGY CORP 0.32%
WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY INC 0.31%
Only in MGC
Goldman Sachs Group Inc 0.45%
Eaton Corp PLC 0.31%
Boeing Co 0.27%
S&P Global Inc 0.21%
Starbucks Corp 0.20%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.16%
KKR & Co Inc 0.11%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.11%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF MGC Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +13.3% +13.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.8% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −1.5 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.05%
Already in the S&P 500 93.7% 98.2%
Holdings 426 165
Net assets, GSLC as of Nov 3, 2026 and MGC as of Oct 31, 2026 $15.3bn $10.1bn

GSLC and MGC on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GSLC

GSLC tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 426 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

MGC

MGC tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +13.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 165 positions, with the top ten at 46.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GSLC or MGC?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GSLC returned +13.3% and MGC +13.9%.
Which is cheaper, GSLC or MGC?
MGC is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GSLC and MGC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GSLC and 98% of MGC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GSLC against MGC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gslc-vs-mgc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.