CGCV vs DGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGCV and DGRW hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned +12.9% over the year. Net assets: $2.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF, and $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund.
DGRW costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points.
| CGCV | DGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.28% |
| Net assets, CGCV as of Sep 30, 2026 and DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 | $2.0bn | $16.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.6% | +12.9% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 38% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32.3% | 36.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGCV and DGRW hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
38% in common
On the same fields
CGCV and DGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGCV
CGCV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 32.3%.
About DGRW
DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGCV or DGRW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCV returned +10.6% and DGRW +12.9%.
- Which is cheaper, CGCV or DGRW?
- DGRW is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGCV against DGRW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-dgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGCV against DGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-dgrw
[CGCV against DGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-dgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.