CGCV vs ESGU: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGCV and ESGU hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and ESGU returned +17.3% over the year. Net assets: $2.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF, and $18.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF.
ESGU costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.7 points; ESGU is 8.6 times larger.
| CGCV | ESGU | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $2.1bn | $18.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.6% | +17.3% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index |
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32.3% | 37.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGCV and ESGU hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
30% in common
On the same fields
CGCV and ESGU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGCV
CGCV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 32.3%.
About ESGU
ESGU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 269 positions, with the top ten at 37.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGCV or ESGU?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCV returned +10.6% and ESGU +17.3%.
- Which is cheaper, CGCV or ESGU?
- ESGU is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGCV against ESGU, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-esgu
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGCV against ESGU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-esgu
[CGCV against ESGU (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-esgu)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.