BLCR vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees

BLCR and IWV hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and BLCR returned +26.3% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $9.8bn for iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF and $20.6bn for iShares Russell 3000 ETF.

IWV costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.6 points; IWV is 2.1 times larger.

BLCR vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees
BLCRIWV
Expense ratio0.36%0.20%
Net assets$9.8bn$20.6bn
Total return, 1 year+26.3%+16.7%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 3000 Index
Holdings in common38%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund48.6%34.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+26.3%
BLCR total return, 1 year
+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
0.36%
BLCR expense ratio
0.20%
IWV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BLCR and IWV hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

38% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BLCR IWV
NVIDIA 7.12% 7.15%
MICROSOFT 6.61% 5.32%
APPLE 4.53% 6.51%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.90% 3.40%
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.06% 2.74%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 5.05% 2.11%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.31% 1.55%
BROADCOM INC 1.35% 2.25%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.44% 1.32%
VISA CLASS A 4.43% 0.87%
ELI LILLY 0.76% 1.26%
INTEL CORPORATION 2.11% 0.64%
Only in BLCR
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS 1.44%
RENTOKIL INITIAL ADS EACH REPRESEN 0.92%
MADISON AIR SOLUTIONS CORP CLASS A 0.35%
Only in IWV
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21%
TESLA INC 1.49%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.19%
ABBVIE 0.65%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 0.64%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.63%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.62%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

BLCR
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +26.3% +16.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.6% (IWB) +16.8% (VTHR)
Gap to its benchmark +9.6 pts vs IWB −0.1 pts vs VTHR
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 85.6% 87.8%
Holdings 52 2600
Net assets $9.8bn $20.6bn

BLCR and IWV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BLCR

BLCR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BLCR or IWV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BLCR returned +26.3% and IWV +16.7%.
Which is cheaper, BLCR or IWV?
IWV is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do BLCR and IWV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of BLCR and 88% of IWV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BLCR against IWV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/blcr-vs-iwv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.