BLCR vs OEF: Differences, Returns & Fees

BLCR and OEF hold 45% of their weight in the same names, and BLCR returned +26.3% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $9.8bn for iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF and $20.8bn for iShares S&P 100 ETF.

OEF costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.5 points; OEF is 2.1 times larger.

BLCR vs OEF: Differences, Returns & Fees
BLCROEF
Expense ratio0.36%0.20%
Net assets$9.8bn$20.8bn
Total return, 1 year+26.3%+16.8%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 100
Holdings in common45%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund48.6%52.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+26.3%
BLCR total return, 1 year
+16.8%
OEF total return, 1 year
0.36%
BLCR expense ratio
0.20%
OEF expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BLCR and OEF hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

45% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BLCR OEF
NVIDIA 7.12% 11.11%
MICROSOFT 6.61% 7.96%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.90% 5.16%
APPLE 4.53% 9.84%
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.06% 4.13%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 5.05% 3.17%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.31% 2.33%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.44% 1.99%
BROADCOM INC 1.35% 3.45%
VISA CLASS A 4.43% 1.32%
INTEL CORPORATION 2.11% 1.04%
CHEVRON 1.35% 0.84%
Only in BLCR
CARDINAL HEALTH 3.60%
ATI 3.01%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL 2.91%
HASBRO 2.40%
CDW 2.36%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS 2.17%
FLEX LTD 2.06%
HOWMET AEROSPACE 2.06%
Only in OEF
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.31%
TESLA INC 2.16%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.92%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.77%
ABBVIE 0.98%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.96%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 0.95%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.93%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

BLCR
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +26.3% +16.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.6% (IWB) not published
Gap to its benchmark +9.6 pts vs IWB not available
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 85.6% 99.9%
Holdings 52 102
Net assets $9.8bn $20.8bn

BLCR and OEF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BLCR

BLCR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

About OEF

OEF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BLCR or OEF?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BLCR returned +26.3% and OEF +16.8%.
Which is cheaper, BLCR or OEF?
OEF is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do BLCR and OEF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of BLCR and 100% of OEF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BLCR against OEF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/blcr-vs-oef

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.