BKDV vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees

BKDV and JAVA hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and BKDV returned +23.4% over the year. Net assets: $1.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF, and $7.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Value ETF.

JAVA costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points.

BKDV vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees
BKDVJAVA
Expense ratio0.60%0.44%
Net assets, BKDV as of Jul 31, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026$1.8bn$7.2bn
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+20.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common34%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund33.3%30.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+23.4%
BKDV total return, 1 year
+20.3%
JAVA total return, 1 year
0.60%
BKDV expense ratio
0.44%
JAVA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BKDV and JAVA hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

34% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BKDV JAVA
AMAZON.COM INC 6.31% 7.76%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.64% 6.31%
CITIGROUP INC 1.54% 1.39%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 3.26% 1.32%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.76% 1.28%
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 1.28% 1.25%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.96% 1.18%
WALT DISNEY COMPANY (THE) 1.18% 1.18%
ABBVIE INC 1.15% 1.82%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.78% 1.12%
RTX CORP 1.75% 0.97%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 2.08% 0.94%
Only in BKDV
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 4.05%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.75%
ASSURANT INC 2.19%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY 2.06%
DELTA AIR LINES INC 1.97%
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA 1.58%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC 1.34%
OMNICOM GROUP INC 1.32%
Only in JAVA
APPLE INC COMMON STOCK 3.93%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 2.19%
WELLS FARGO & CO COMMON 2.17%
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMMON 1.82%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP/THE 1.64%
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY 1.29%
CHEVRON CORP COMMON 1.22%
NEXTERA ENERGY INC 1.18%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +23.4% +20.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +26.4% (IWD) +26.4% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark −3.0 pts vs IWD −6.2 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.44%
Already in the S&P 500 93.7% 90.4%
Holdings 80 151
Net assets, BKDV as of Jul 31, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.8bn $7.2bn

BKDV and JAVA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BKDV

BKDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 33.3%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

About JAVA

JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BKDV or JAVA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BKDV returned +23.4% and JAVA +20.3%.
Which is cheaper, BKDV or JAVA?
JAVA is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do BKDV and JAVA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of BKDV and 90% of JAVA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BKDV against JAVA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-java

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.