FELV vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees

FELV and JAVA hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and FELV returned +28.5% over the year. Net assets: $3.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF, and $7.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Value ETF.

FELV costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points; JAVA is 2.1 times larger.

FELV vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees
FELVJAVA
Expense ratio0.18%0.44%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$3.2bn$6.7bn
Total return, 1 year+28.5%+20.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common42%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.2%30.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+28.5%
FELV total return, 1 year
+20.3%
JAVA total return, 1 year
0.18%
FELV expense ratio
0.44%
JAVA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FELV and JAVA hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

42% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FELV JAVA
AMAZON.COM INC 5.15% 7.76%
APPLE INC 4.66% 3.93%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.39% 6.31%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC DEL 3.08% 1.32%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON 1.30% 1.28%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 1.18% 1.18%
CHEVRON CORP NEW 0.98% 1.22%
WELLS FARGO and CO 0.97% 2.17%
RTX CORP 1.09% 0.97%
SCHWAB CHARLES CORP 0.91% 1.64%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 0.86% 2.19%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 0.86% 1.12%
Only in FELV
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.62%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 1.80%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.23%
PFIZER INC 0.74%
ALLSTATE CORP 0.68%
GENERAL MOTORS CO 0.66%
STATE STREET CORP 0.66%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 0.65%
Only in JAVA
DOVER CORP COMMON STOCK 1.10%
AUTOZONE INC COMMON 1.00%
TIMKEN CO/THE COMMON 0.86%
NVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK 0.84%
VIVMARK RESIDENTIAL REIT 0.74%
INGERSOLL RAND INC 0.71%
GATES INDUSTRIAL CORP 0.68%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.66%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FELV
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +28.5% +20.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +26.4% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark not available −6.2 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.44%
Already in the S&P 500 87.5% 90.4%
Holdings 351 151
Net assets, FELV as of Sep 30, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026 $3.4bn $7.2bn

FELV and JAVA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FELV

FELV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +28.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 351 positions, with the top ten at 26.2%.

About JAVA

JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FELV or JAVA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FELV returned +28.5% and JAVA +20.3%.
Which is cheaper, FELV or JAVA?
FELV is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FELV and JAVA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FELV and 90% of JAVA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FELV against JAVA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/felv-vs-java

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.