JAVA vs SPLV: Differences, Returns & Fees

JAVA and SPLV hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and JAVA returned +20.3% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $7.2bn for JPMorgan Active Value ETF and $7.0bn for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF.

SPLV costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.3 points.

JAVA vs SPLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
JAVASPLV
Expense ratio0.44%0.25%
Net assets$7.2bn$7.0bn
Total return, 1 year+20.3%+2.0%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Low Volatility Index
Holdings in common16%
Holdings datedOct 9, 2026Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.6%12.7%
Below its high7.1%, high on Jul 28, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+20.3%
JAVA total return, 1 year
+2.0%
SPLV total return, 1 year
0.44%
JAVA expense ratio
0.25%
SPLV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JAVA and SPLV hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

16% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding JAVA SPLV
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 1.32% 1.44%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.28% 1.14%
CHEVRON CORP COMMON 1.22% 0.99%
NEXTERA ENERGY INC 1.18% 0.87%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 2.19% 0.81%
VIVMARK RESIDENTIAL REIT 0.74% 1.00%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 0.71% 0.86%
SEMPRA COMMON STOCK USD 0.62% 1.01%
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL 0.58% 0.89%
UNION PACIFIC CORP 0.58% 0.90%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 0.54% 1.15%
VENTAS INC REIT USD 0.25 0.51% 0.92%
Only in JAVA
AMAZON.COM INC COMMON 7.76%
MICROSOFT CORP COMMON 6.31%
APPLE INC COMMON STOCK 3.93%
WELLS FARGO & CO COMMON 2.17%
ABBVIE INC COMMON STOCK 1.82%
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMMON 1.82%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP/THE 1.64%
META PLATFORMS INC 1.55%
Only in SPLV
Evergy Inc 1.28%
WEC Energy Group Inc 1.27%
FirstEnergy Corp 1.27%
Duke Energy Corp 1.27%
Regency Centers Corp 1.25%
Atmos Energy Corp 1.25%
Pinnacle West Capital Corp 1.23%
Alliant Energy Corp 1.22%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +20.3% +2.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +26.4% (IWD) not published
Gap to its benchmark −6.2 pts vs IWD not available
Expense ratio 0.44% 0.25%
Already in the S&P 500 90.4% 98.7%
Holdings 151 108
Net assets $7.2bn $7.0bn

JAVA and SPLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About JAVA

JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

About SPLV

SPLV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 108 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JAVA or SPLV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JAVA returned +20.3% and SPLV +2.0%.
Which is cheaper, JAVA or SPLV?
SPLV is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do JAVA and SPLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of JAVA and 99% of SPLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JAVA against SPLV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/java-vs-splv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.