BKDV vs FDVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
BKDV and FDVV hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and BKDV returned +23.4% over the year. Net assets: $1.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF, and $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF.
FDVV costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.3 points; FDVV is 5.5 times larger.
| BKDV | FDVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $1.8bn | $10.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +14.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Fidelity High Dividend Index |
| Holdings in common | 18% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.3% | 33.8% |
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BKDV and FDVV hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
18% in common
On the same fields
BKDV and FDVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BKDV
BKDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 33.3%.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
About FDVV
FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BKDV or FDVV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BKDV returned +23.4% and FDVV +14.1%.
- Which is cheaper, BKDV or FDVV?
- FDVV is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BKDV against FDVV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-fdvv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BKDV against FDVV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-fdvv
[BKDV against FDVV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-fdvv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.