BKDV vs FDL: Differences, Returns & Fees
BKDV and FDL hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and BKDV returned +23.4% over the year. Net assets: $1.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF, and $7.7bn on Oct 9, 2026 for First Trust Morningstar ETF.
FDL costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points.
| BKDV | FDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.43% |
| Net assets, BKDV as of Jul 31, 2026 and FDL as of Oct 9, 2026 | $1.8bn | $7.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +20.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index |
| Holdings in common | 6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.3% | 50.4% |
| Below its high | 5.9%, high on Aug 24, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BKDV and FDL hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
6% in common
On the same fields
BKDV and FDL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BKDV
BKDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 33.3%.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
About FDL
FDL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.43% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 50.4%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BKDV or FDL?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BKDV returned +23.4% and FDL +20.6%.
- Which is cheaper, BKDV or FDL?
- FDL is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BKDV against FDL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-fdl
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BKDV against FDL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-fdl
[BKDV against FDL (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-fdl)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.