BKDV vs FTCS: Differences, Returns & Fees
BKDV and FTCS hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and BKDV returned +23.4% over the year. Net assets: $1.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF, and $7.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for First Trust Capital Strength ETF.
FTCS costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.3 points.
| BKDV | FTCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.53% |
| Net assets, BKDV as of Jul 31, 2026 and FTCS as of Oct 9, 2026 | $1.8bn | $7.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +4.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Capital Strength Index |
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.3% | 22.6% |
| Below its high | 6.1%, high on Aug 24, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BKDV and FTCS hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
9% in common
On the same fields
BKDV and FTCS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BKDV
BKDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 33.3%.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
About FTCS
FTCS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.53% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 22.6%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BKDV or FTCS?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BKDV returned +23.4% and FTCS +4.1%.
- Which is cheaper, BKDV or FTCS?
- FTCS is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BKDV against FTCS, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-ftcs
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BKDV against FTCS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-ftcs
[BKDV against FTCS (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bkdv-vs-ftcs)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.