Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
SMH vs SMHX: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SMH returned +43.4% to SMHX's +27.1%; 46% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SMH and SMHX
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $67.3bn for VanEck Semiconductor ETF and $241m for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF.
79% of SMH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 21% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.
66% of SMHX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 34% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.35% a year; their one-year returns differ by 16.3 points; SMH is far larger, $67.3bn against $241m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | SMH | SMHX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +43.4% | +27.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 24.6%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | 25.9%, high on Jun 3, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | +15.0% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 28.4 pts | ahead by 12.1 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $67.3bn | $241m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 46% | |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Sep 6, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 112 weekly returns · each against ACWIFrom Sep 2024 to Oct 2026, SMH returned slightly more: +144.8% to +133.9%. SMH swung slightly less: 33.7% to 37.2%. SMH fell less at its worst: −30.9% to −37.0%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | SMH | SMHX | ACWI | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +144.8% | +133.9% | SMH (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +51.5% | +48.4% | SMH (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +143.0% | +133.7% | SMH (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 33.7% | 37.2% | SMH (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 21.1% | 23.5% | SMH (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −30.9% | −37.0% | SMH | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 295.3% | Not measured | 100.0% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 133.0% | 145.7% | 100.0% | SMH (slight) | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 1.94 | 2.12 | 1.00 | SMH lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.65 | 0.64 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 1.28 | 1.14 | SMH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 2.05 | 1.81 | SMH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.223 | 0.200 | 0.137 | SMH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 1.67 | 1.31 | SMH | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | ACWI | ACWI | ACWI | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +16.8% a year | +13.4% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 1.22 | 0.87 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −10.6% to +44.2% | −17.2% to +44.1% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | 1.24 | 1.05 | SMH | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 23.9% | 27.3% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 112 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SMH and SMHX hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
46% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SMH | SMHX | SMH | SMHX |
| 3 months | −11.5% | −12.5% | −10.2 pts vs ACWI | −11.2 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −8.3% | −7.7% | −10.9 pts vs ACWI | −10.3 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +43.4% | +27.1% | +28.4 pts vs ACWI | +12.1 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +241.8% | – | +164.2 pts vs ACWI | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: SMH Dec 2011 · SMHX Aug 2024 | +3,851.6% | +102.4% | +3,444.2 pts vs ACWI | +61.5 pts vs ACWI |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
46% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Client brief: a two-page PDF of this comparison.
Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
SMH
By weight, 79% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 70% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +43.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 28.4 pts. It sits 24.6% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
SMHX
By weight, 66% of SMHX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 87%. The top ten holdings are 74% of the fund across 22 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 12.1 pts. It sits 25.9% below its all-time high of Jun 3, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do SMH and SMHX hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 46% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SMH against SMHX, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smh-vs-smhx
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). SMH against SMHX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smh-vs-smhx
[SMH against SMHX (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smh-vs-smhx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.