Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

SMH vs SOXQ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SMH returned +43.4% to SOXQ's +47.7%; 74% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SMH and SOXQ

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $67.3bn for VanEck Semiconductor ETF and $2.8bn for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF.

At a glance
78.8%
SMH in the S&P 500
81.4%
SOXQ in the S&P 500
+43.4%
SMH total return, 1 year
+47.7%
SOXQ total return, 1 year
SMH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 21% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
21% of its weight is outside the S&P 50079% of SMH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 21% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.79%21%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 81% · top ten 70% of the fund · 25 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 2, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 85% in21% of its weight is outside the S&P 50079% of SMH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 21% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.79%21%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 81% · Nasdaq-100: 85% in

79% of SMH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 21% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.

SOXQ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 19% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of SOXQ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.81%19%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 81% · top ten 61% of the fund · 32 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 84% in19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of SOXQ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.81%19%in the S&P 50019% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 81% · Nasdaq-100: 84% in

81% of SOXQ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SOXQ costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points; SMH is far larger, $67.3bn against $2.8bn.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

SMH vs SOXQ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureSMHSOXQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+43.4%+47.7%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high24.6%, high on Jun 22, 202629.7%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 28.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.19%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$67.3bn$2.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common74%
ETFIQ S&P 500 Difference Score · SOXQ scores higher How much of its weight does it not share with the S&P 500?
IQ Themes Score33.8SMH34.6SOXQ

How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.4, the lowest in this set 99.6, the highest

Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Jun 18, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026 · 280 weekly returns
SMH SOXQ
Return
Total return edge SMH +336.2% +254.6%
Annualized edge SMH +31.5% +26.5%
Price return edge SMH +323.2% +238.5%
Risk
Volatility edge SMH (slight) 33.1% 34.4%
Max drawdown edge SMH (slight) −44.2% −45.2%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SMH 0.88 0.75
Sortino edge SMH 1.36 1.14
Calmar edge SMH 0.71 0.59
Reading

From Jun 2021 to Oct 2026, SMH returned more: +336.2% to +254.6%. SMH swung slightly less: 33.1% to 34.4%. SMH fell slightly less at its worst: −44.2% to −45.2%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SMH vs SOXQ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureSMHSOXQEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+336.2%+254.6%SMHPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+31.5%+26.5%SMHTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+323.2%+238.5%SMHPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility33.1%34.4%SMH (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation21.5%22.6%SMH (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−44.2%−45.2%SMH (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.880.75SMHReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.361.14SMHReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.710.59SMHAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 280 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

74%

By the books each fund has filed, SMH and SOXQ hold 74% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

74% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SMH SOXQ
Nvidia Corp 20.57% 12.23%
Broadcom Inc 5.77% 9.77%
Texas Instruments Inc 5.97% 5.24%
Analog Devices Inc 5.03% 5.05%
Micron Technology Inc 4.63% 7.77%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.17% 4.48%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co L 9.62% 4.25%
Asml Holding Nv 4.49% 3.99%
Qualcomm Inc 3.90% 4.20%
Kla Corp 4.27% 3.88%
Applied Materials Inc 4.07% 3.63%
Marvell Technology Inc 3.41% 3.54%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SMH
Sk Hynix Inc 4.22%
Synopsys Inc 2.22%
Cadence Design Systems Inc 2.20%
Stmicroelectronics Nv 0.97%
Only in SOXQ
Coherent Corp 2.01%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.40%
Qnity Electronics Inc 1.23%
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc 1.16%
Entegris Inc 1.15%
Tower Semiconductor Ltd 0.91%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc 0.89%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp 0.74%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: SMH vs SOXQ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowSMHSOXQSMHSOXQ
3 months−11.5%−14.4%−10.2 pts vs ACWInot measured
6 months−8.3%−10.4%−10.9 pts vs ACWInot measured
1 year+43.4%+47.7%+28.4 pts vs ACWInot measured
3 years+241.8%+202.3%+164.2 pts vs ACWInot measured
Since launchNot the same days: SMH Dec 2011 · SOXQ Jun 2021+3,851.6%+235.1%+3,444.2 pts vs ACWInot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF · Holds 25 stocks in semiconductors, 79% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF · Holds 32 stocks in semiconductors, 81% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Semiconductors Semiconductors
In the S&P 500 78.8% 81.4%
Active share vs the S&P 500 80.7% 80.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 84.5% 84.2%
Holdings 25 32
Top ten, share of the fund 69.5% 60.9%
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.19%
Fee for the differing part 0.43% 0.24%
Total return, 1 year +43.4% +47.7%
vs its benchmark +28.4 pts vs ACWI not measured
Below its high −24.6% −29.7%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $67.3bn $2.8bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

74% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief: a two-page PDF of this comparison.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SMH and SOXQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SMH

By weight, 79% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 70% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +43.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 28.4 pts. It sits 24.6% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

SOXQ

By weight, 81% of SOXQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +47.7% with distributions reinvested. It sits 29.7% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do SMH and SOXQ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 74% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, SMH or SOXQ?
SMH has 79% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SOXQ has 81%, so SOXQ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, SMH or SOXQ?
SMH charges 0.35% a year and SOXQ charges 0.19%, so SOXQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SMH against SOXQ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smh-vs-soxq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.