Which is more different from the S&P 500, MGNR or TURF?

MGNR has 21% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so MGNR differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, MGNR or TURF?

MGNR charges 0.75% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so TURF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

MGNR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

TURF holds 30.2% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and MGNR 21.3%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MGNR and TURF

Net assets: $842m on Jul 31, 2026 for American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF, and $335m on Nov 3, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF.

MGNR on its own →TURF on its own →

At a glance

21.3%

MGNR in the S&P 500

30.2%

TURF in the S&P 500

+21.7%

MGNR total return, 1 year

+25.6%

TURF total return, 1 year

MGNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 79% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

21% of MGNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

TURF · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 70% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

30% of TURF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 70% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

TURF costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.9 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MGNR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	MGNR	TURF
Return
Measure	MGNR	TURF
Total return, 1 year	+21.7%	+25.6%
Drawdown
Measure	MGNR	TURF
Below its all-time high	16.0%, high on Jun 2, 2026	9.3%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	MGNR	TURF
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+32.9%	+26.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 11.2 pts	behind by 1.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	MGNR	TURF
Expense ratio	0.75%	0.44%
Net assets, MGNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and TURF as of Nov 3, 2026	$842m	$335m
Holdings
Measure	MGNR	TURF
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: MGNR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	MGNR	TURF	MGNR	TURF
3 months	−6.7%	+0.3%	−8.1 pts vs GNR	−1.0 pts vs GUNR
6 months	−12.8%	−5.5%	−13.2 pts vs GNR	−3.0 pts vs GUNR
1 year	+21.7%	+25.6%	−11.2 pts vs GNR	−1.2 pts vs GUNR
Since launchNot the same days: MGNR Feb 2024 · TURF Jun 2025	+98.8%	+33.5%	+45.6 pts vs GNR	−2.5 pts vs GUNR

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF · Holds 40 stocks in natural resources, 21% of its weight in S&P 500 companies TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF · Holds 84 stocks in natural resources, 30% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer American Beacon T. Rowe Price

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 21.3% 30.2%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.6% 97.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 2.3% 0.7%

Holdings 40 84

Top ten, share of the fund 41.3% 36.7%

Expense ratio 0.75% 0.44%

Fee for the differing part 0.75% 0.45%

Total return, 1 year +21.7% +25.6%

vs its benchmark −11.2 pts vs GNR −1.2 pts vs GUNR

Below its high −16.0% −9.3%

Net assets, MGNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and TURF as of Nov 3, 2026 $842m $335m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

MGNR

By weight, 21% of MGNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 40 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested against +32.9% for its benchmark, the S&P Global Natural Resources Index, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. It sits 16.0% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

TURF

By weight, 30% of TURF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 84 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested against +26.8% for its benchmark, the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Net, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. It sits 9.3% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, MGNR or TURF?: MGNR has 21% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so MGNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, MGNR or TURF?: MGNR charges 0.75% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so TURF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

MGNR vs NRES MGNR vs CCNR MGNR vs NANR MGNR vs GNR TURF vs CCNR TURF vs HAP TURF vs GNR TURF vs FTRI

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →MGNR on its own →TURF on its own →MGNR dividend history →TURF dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

MGNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MGNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

American Beacon website ↗

TURF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

TURF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

T. Rowe Price website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MGNR against TURF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/mgnr-vs-turf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.