Which is more different from the S&P 500, CCNR or TURF?

CCNR has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so CCNR differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CCNR or TURF?

CCNR charges 0.39% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so CCNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

CCNR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

TURF holds 30.2% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and CCNR 8.9%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CCNR and TURF

Net assets: $427m on Jul 31, 2026 for ALPS | CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF, and $335m on Nov 3, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF.

CCNR on its own →TURF on its own →

At a glance

8.9%

CCNR in the S&P 500

30.2%

TURF in the S&P 500

+25.6%

CCNR total return, 1 year

+25.6%

TURF total return, 1 year

CCNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

9% of CCNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

TURF · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 70% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

30% of TURF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 70% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CCNR costs 0.05 points a year less; both returned +25.6% over a year.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CCNR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	CCNR	TURF
Return
Measure	CCNR	TURF
Total return, 1 year	+25.6%	+25.6%
Drawdown
Measure	CCNR	TURF
Below its all-time high	12.1%, high on Sep 9, 2026	9.3%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	CCNR	TURF
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+26.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 1.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	CCNR	TURF
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.44%
Net assets, CCNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and TURF as of Nov 3, 2026	$427m	$335m
Holdings
Measure	CCNR	TURF
Holdings in common	not published
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	10%	37%

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CCNR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	CCNR	TURF	CCNR	TURF
3 months	−3.6%	+0.3%	not measured	−1.0 pts vs GUNR
6 months	−9.6%	−5.5%	not measured	−3.0 pts vs GUNR
1 year	+25.6%	+25.6%	not measured	−1.2 pts vs GUNR
Since launchNot the same days: CCNR Jul 2024 · TURF Jun 2025	+53.5%	+33.5%	not measured	−2.5 pts vs GUNR

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CCNR ALPS | CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF · Holds 310 stocks in natural resources, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF · Holds 84 stocks in natural resources, 30% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer ALPS T. Rowe Price

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 8.9% 30.2%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.6% 97.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.2% 0.7%

Holdings 310 84

Top ten, share of the fund 10.5% 36.7%

Expense ratio 0.39% 0.44%

Fee for the differing part 0.40% 0.45%

Total return, 1 year +25.6% +25.6%

vs its benchmark not measured −1.2 pts vs GUNR

Below its high −12.1% −9.3%

Net assets, CCNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and TURF as of Nov 3, 2026 $427m $335m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

CCNR

By weight, 9% of CCNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 10% of the fund across 310 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 12.1% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

TURF

By weight, 30% of TURF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 84 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested against +26.8% for its benchmark, the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Net, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. It sits 9.3% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CCNR or TURF?: CCNR has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so CCNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CCNR or TURF?: CCNR charges 0.39% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so CCNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CCNR vs NRES CCNR vs NANR CCNR vs MGNR CCNR vs GNR TURF vs CSNR TURF vs HAP TURF vs IGE TURF vs NANR

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CCNR on its own →TURF on its own →CCNR dividend history →CCNR holdings →TURF dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CCNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CCNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ALPS website ↗

TURF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

TURF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

T. Rowe Price website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CCNR against TURF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ccnr-vs-turf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.