Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSNR or TURF?

CSNR has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so TURF differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CSNR or TURF?

CSNR charges 0.50% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so TURF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

CSNR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

CSNR holds 33.1% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and TURF 30.2%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CSNR and TURF

Net assets: $91m on Jun 30, 2026 for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF, and $335m on Nov 3, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF.

CSNR on its own →TURF on its own →

At a glance

33.1%

CSNR in the S&P 500

30.2%

TURF in the S&P 500

+29.7%

CSNR total return, 1 year

+25.6%

TURF total return, 1 year

CSNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 67% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

33% of CSNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

TURF · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 70% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

30% of TURF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 70% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

TURF costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.1 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CSNR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	CSNR	TURF
Return
Measure	CSNR	TURF
Total return, 1 year	+29.7%	+25.6%
Drawdown
Measure	CSNR	TURF
Below its all-time high	7.6%, high on Sep 9, 2026	9.3%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	CSNR	TURF
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+32.9%	+26.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 3.2 pts	behind by 1.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	CSNR	TURF
Expense ratio	0.50%	0.44%
Net assets, CSNR as of Jun 30, 2026 and TURF as of Nov 3, 2026	$91m	$335m
Holdings
Measure	CSNR	TURF
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CSNR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	CSNR	TURF	CSNR	TURF
3 months	+1.4%	+0.3%	0.0 pts vs GNR	−1.0 pts vs GUNR
6 months	−2.2%	−5.5%	−2.6 pts vs GNR	−3.0 pts vs GUNR
1 year	+29.7%	+25.6%	−3.2 pts vs GNR	−1.2 pts vs GUNR
Since launchNot the same days: CSNR Feb 2025 · TURF Jun 2025	+50.4%	+33.5%	+3.7 pts vs GNR	−2.5 pts vs GUNR

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF · Holds 58 stocks in natural resources, 33% of its weight in S&P 500 companies TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF · Holds 84 stocks in natural resources, 30% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Cohen & Steers T. Rowe Price

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 33.1% 30.2%

Active share vs the S&P 500 97.7% 97.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.7%

Holdings 58 84

Top ten, share of the fund 35.7% 36.7%

Expense ratio 0.50% 0.44%

Fee for the differing part 0.51% 0.45%

Total return, 1 year +29.7% +25.6%

vs its benchmark −3.2 pts vs GNR −1.2 pts vs GUNR

Below its high −7.6% −9.3%

Net assets, CSNR as of Jun 30, 2026 and TURF as of Nov 3, 2026 $91m $335m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

CSNR

By weight, 33% of CSNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +29.7% with distributions reinvested against +32.9% for its benchmark, the S&P Global Natural Resources Index - net, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

TURF

By weight, 30% of TURF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 84 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested against +26.8% for its benchmark, the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Net, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. It sits 9.3% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSNR or TURF?: CSNR has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so TURF differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CSNR or TURF?: CSNR charges 0.50% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so TURF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CSNR vs NRES CSNR vs GUNR CSNR vs HAP CSNR vs CCNR TURF vs FTRI TURF vs FTWO TURF vs GNR TURF vs GUNR

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CSNR on its own →TURF on its own →CSNR dividend history →TURF dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CSNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CSNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Cohen & Steers website ↗

TURF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

TURF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

T. Rowe Price website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CSNR against TURF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/csnr-vs-turf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.