Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSNR or HAP?

CSNR has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and HAP has 39%, so CSNR differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CSNR or HAP?

CSNR charges 0.50% a year and HAP charges 0.41%, so HAP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

CSNR vs HAP: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

HAP holds 39.0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and CSNR 33.1%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CSNR and HAP

Net assets: $91m on Jun 30, 2026 for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF, and $321m on Nov 3, 2026 for VanEck Natural Resources ETF.

CSNR on its own →HAP on its own →

At a glance

33.1%

CSNR in the S&P 500

39.0%

HAP in the S&P 500

+29.7%

CSNR total return, 1 year

+34.3%

HAP total return, 1 year

CSNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 67% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

33% of CSNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

HAP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 61% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

39% of HAP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.

Pair scorecard

HAP costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.6 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CSNR vs HAP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	CSNR	HAP
Return
Measure	CSNR	HAP
Total return, 1 year	+29.7%	+34.3%
Drawdown
Measure	CSNR	HAP
Below its all-time high	7.6%, high on Sep 9, 2026	5.9%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	CSNR	HAP
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+32.9%	+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 3.2 pts	ahead by 19.3 pts
Cost and size
Measure	CSNR	HAP
Expense ratio	0.50%	0.41%
Net assets, CSNR as of Jun 30, 2026 and HAP as of Nov 3, 2026	$91m	$321m
Holdings
Measure	CSNR	HAP
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CSNR vs HAP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	CSNR	HAP	CSNR	HAP
3 months	+1.4%	+2.5%	0.0 pts vs GNR	+3.8 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−2.2%	+0.3%	−2.6 pts vs GNR	−2.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year	+29.7%	+34.3%	−3.2 pts vs GNR	+19.3 pts vs ACWI
3 years	–	+65.2%	–	−12.4 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: CSNR Feb 2025 · HAP Sep 2008	+50.4%	+196.0%	+3.7 pts vs GNR	not measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF · Holds 58 stocks in natural resources, 33% of its weight in S&P 500 companies HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF · Holds 140 stocks in natural resources, 39% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Cohen & Steers VanEck

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 33.1% 39.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 97.7% 96.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.7%

Holdings 58 140

Top ten, share of the fund 35.7% 38.4%

Expense ratio 0.50% 0.41%

Fee for the differing part 0.51% 0.43%

Total return, 1 year +29.7% +34.3%

vs its benchmark −3.2 pts vs GNR +19.3 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −7.6% −5.9%

Net assets, CSNR as of Jun 30, 2026 and HAP as of Nov 3, 2026 $91m $321m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

CSNR

By weight, 33% of CSNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +29.7% with distributions reinvested against +32.9% for its benchmark, the S&P Global Natural Resources Index - net, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

HAP

By weight, 39% of HAP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 140 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +34.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 19.3 pts. It sits 5.9% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSNR or HAP?: CSNR has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and HAP has 39%, so CSNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CSNR or HAP?: CSNR charges 0.50% a year and HAP charges 0.41%, so HAP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CSNR vs NRES CSNR vs TURF CSNR vs IGE CSNR vs NANR HAP vs NRES HAP vs IGE HAP vs MGNR HAP vs FTRI

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CSNR on its own →HAP on its own →CSNR dividend history →HAP dividend history →HAP holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CSNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CSNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Cohen & Steers website ↗

HAP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

HAP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

VanEck website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CSNR against HAP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/csnr-vs-hap

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.