Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSNR or NANR?

CSNR has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NANR has 47%, so CSNR differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CSNR or NANR?

CSNR charges 0.50% a year and NANR charges 0.35%, so NANR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

CSNR vs NANR: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

NANR holds 47.3% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and CSNR 33.1%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CSNR and NANR

Net assets: $91m on Jun 30, 2026 for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF, and $814m on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF.

CSNR on its own →NANR on its own →

At a glance

33.1%

CSNR in the S&P 500

47.3%

NANR in the S&P 500

+29.7%

CSNR total return, 1 year

+39.4%

NANR total return, 1 year

CSNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 67% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

33% of CSNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

NANR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 53% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

47% of NANR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

NANR costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.7 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CSNR vs NANR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	CSNR	NANR
Return
Measure	CSNR	NANR
Total return, 1 year	+29.7%	+39.4%
Drawdown
Measure	CSNR	NANR
Below its all-time high	7.6%, high on Sep 9, 2026	7.6%, high on Aug 21, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	CSNR	NANR
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+32.9%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 3.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	CSNR	NANR
Expense ratio	0.50%	0.35%
Net assets, CSNR as of Jun 30, 2026 and NANR as of Nov 3, 2026	$91m	$814m
Holdings
Measure	CSNR	NANR
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CSNR vs NANR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	CSNR	NANR	CSNR	NANR
3 months	+1.4%	+3.3%	0.0 pts vs GNR	not measured
6 months	−2.2%	+2.1%	−2.6 pts vs GNR	not measured
1 year	+29.7%	+39.4%	−3.2 pts vs GNR	not measured
3 years	–	+75.2%	–	not measured
Since launchNot the same days: CSNR Feb 2025 · NANR Dec 2015	+50.4%	+337.7%	+3.7 pts vs GNR	not measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF · Holds 58 stocks in natural resources, 33% of its weight in S&P 500 companies NANR State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF · Holds 202 stocks in natural resources, 47% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Cohen & Steers State Street

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 33.1% 47.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 97.7% 97.5%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 1.6%

Holdings 58 202

Top ten, share of the fund 35.7% 41.2%

Expense ratio 0.50% 0.35%

Fee for the differing part 0.51% 0.36%

Total return, 1 year +29.7% +39.4%

vs its benchmark −3.2 pts vs GNR not measured

Below its high −7.6% −7.6%

Net assets, CSNR as of Jun 30, 2026 and NANR as of Nov 3, 2026 $91m $814m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

CSNR

By weight, 33% of CSNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +29.7% with distributions reinvested against +32.9% for its benchmark, the S&P Global Natural Resources Index - net, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

NANR

By weight, 47% of NANR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 202 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +39.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Aug 21, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSNR or NANR?: CSNR has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NANR has 47%, so CSNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CSNR or NANR?: CSNR charges 0.50% a year and NANR charges 0.35%, so NANR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CSNR vs MGNR CSNR vs HAP CSNR vs GNR CSNR vs FTRI NANR vs NRES NANR vs FTRI NANR vs FTWO NANR vs HAP

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CSNR on its own →NANR on its own →CSNR dividend history →NANR dividend history →NANR holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CSNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CSNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Cohen & Steers website ↗

NANR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

NANR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CSNR against NANR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/csnr-vs-nanr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.