Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSNR or MGNR?

CSNR has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and MGNR has 21%, so MGNR differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CSNR or MGNR?

CSNR charges 0.50% a year and MGNR charges 0.75%, so CSNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

CSNR vs MGNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

CSNR holds 33.1% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and MGNR 21.3%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CSNR and MGNR

Net assets: $91m on Jun 30, 2026 for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF, and $842m on Jul 31, 2026 for American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF.

CSNR on its own →MGNR on its own →

At a glance

33.1%

CSNR in the S&P 500

21.3%

MGNR in the S&P 500

+29.7%

CSNR total return, 1 year

+21.7%

MGNR total return, 1 year

CSNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 67% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

33% of CSNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

MGNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 79% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

21% of MGNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CSNR costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.0 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CSNR vs MGNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	CSNR	MGNR
Return
Measure	CSNR	MGNR
Total return, 1 year	+29.7%	+21.7%
Drawdown
Measure	CSNR	MGNR
Below its all-time high	7.6%, high on Sep 9, 2026	16.0%, high on Jun 2, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	CSNR	MGNR
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+32.9%	+32.9%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 3.2 pts	behind by 11.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	CSNR	MGNR
Expense ratio	0.50%	0.75%
Net assets, CSNR as of Jun 30, 2026 and MGNR as of Jul 31, 2026	$91m	$842m
Holdings
Measure	CSNR	MGNR
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CSNR vs MGNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	CSNR	MGNR	CSNR	MGNR
3 months	+1.4%	−6.7%	0.0 pts vs GNR	−8.1 pts vs GNR
6 months	−2.2%	−12.8%	−2.6 pts vs GNR	−13.2 pts vs GNR
1 year	+29.7%	+21.7%	−3.2 pts vs GNR	−11.2 pts vs GNR
Since launchNot the same days: CSNR Feb 2025 · MGNR Feb 2024	+50.4%	+98.8%	+3.7 pts vs GNR	+45.6 pts vs GNR

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF · Holds 58 stocks in natural resources, 33% of its weight in S&P 500 companies MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF · Holds 40 stocks in natural resources, 21% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Cohen & Steers American Beacon

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 33.1% 21.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 97.7% 99.6%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 2.3%

Holdings 58 40

Top ten, share of the fund 35.7% 41.3%

Expense ratio 0.50% 0.75%

Fee for the differing part 0.51% 0.75%

Total return, 1 year +29.7% +21.7%

vs its benchmark −3.2 pts vs GNR −11.2 pts vs GNR

Below its high −7.6% −16.0%

Net assets, CSNR as of Jun 30, 2026 and MGNR as of Jul 31, 2026 $91m $842m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

CSNR

By weight, 33% of CSNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +29.7% with distributions reinvested against +32.9% for its benchmark, the S&P Global Natural Resources Index - net, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

MGNR

By weight, 21% of MGNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 40 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested against +32.9% for its benchmark, the S&P Global Natural Resources Index, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. It sits 16.0% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSNR or MGNR?: CSNR has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and MGNR has 21%, so MGNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CSNR or MGNR?: CSNR charges 0.50% a year and MGNR charges 0.75%, so CSNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CSNR vs IGE CSNR vs FTRI CSNR vs GUNR CSNR vs FTWO MGNR vs NRES MGNR vs NANR MGNR vs FTRI MGNR vs FTWO

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CSNR on its own →MGNR on its own →CSNR dividend history →MGNR dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CSNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CSNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Cohen & Steers website ↗

MGNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MGNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

American Beacon website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CSNR against MGNR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/csnr-vs-mgnr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.