IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

CSNR vs FTWO: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

FTWO holds 67.8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and CSNR 33.1%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CSNR and FTWO

Net assets on Jun 30, 2026: $91m for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF and $73m for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF.

CSNR on its own →FTWO on its own →
At a glance
33.1%
CSNR in the S&P 500
67.8%
FTWO in the S&P 500
+29.7%
CSNR total return, 1 year
+14.6%
FTWO total return, 1 year
CSNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 67% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
67% of its weight is outside the S&P 50033% of CSNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.33%67%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 36% of the fund · 58 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in67% of its weight is outside the S&P 50033% of CSNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.33%67%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

33% of CSNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

FTWO · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 32% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
32% of its weight is outside the S&P 50068% of FTWO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 32% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.68%32%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 55% of the fund · 50 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 9% in32% of its weight is outside the S&P 50068% of FTWO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 32% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.68%32%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 95% · Nasdaq-100: 9% in

68% of FTWO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 32% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

FTWO costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.1 points; CSNR is 1.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CSNR vs FTWO: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureCSNRFTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.7%+14.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high7.6%, high on Sep 9, 202610.6%, high on Mar 2, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNatural resourcesNatural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+32.9%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 3.2 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.49%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$91m$73m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CSNR vs FTWO: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowCSNRFTWOCSNRFTWO
3 months+1.4%−2.3%0.0 pts vs GNRnot measured
6 months−2.2%−4.7%−2.6 pts vs GNRnot measured
1 year+29.7%+14.6%−3.2 pts vs GNRnot measured
3 years–+89.5%–not measured
Since launchNot the same days: CSNR Feb 2025 · FTWO Aug 2023+50.4%+82.2%+3.7 pts vs GNRnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF · Holds 58 stocks in natural resources, 33% of its weight in S&P 500 companies FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF · Holds 50 stocks in natural resources, 68% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Cohen & Steers Strive
Theme Natural resources Natural resources
In the S&P 500 33.1% 67.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 97.7% 95.1%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 8.9%
Holdings 58 50
Top ten, share of the fund 35.7% 54.9%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.49%
Fee for the differing part 0.51% 0.52%
Total return, 1 year +29.7% +14.6%
vs its benchmark −3.2 pts vs GNR not measured
Below its high −7.6% −10.6%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 $91m $73m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CSNR

By weight, 33% of CSNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +29.7% with distributions reinvested against +32.9% for its benchmark, the S&P Global Natural Resources Index - net, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

FTWO

By weight, 68% of FTWO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +14.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 10.6% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSNR or FTWO?
CSNR has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and FTWO has 68%, so CSNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CSNR or FTWO?
CSNR charges 0.50% a year and FTWO charges 0.49%, so FTWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CSNR vs FTRICSNR vs MGNRCSNR vs GNRCSNR vs GUNRFTWO vs IGEFTWO vs MGNRFTWO vs NRESFTWO vs HAP
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CSNR on its own →FTWO on its own →CSNR dividend history →FTWO dividend history →FTWO holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
CSNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
CSNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Cohen & Steers website ↗
FTWO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
FTWO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Strive website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CSNR against FTWO, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/csnr-vs-ftwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.