Which is more different from the S&P 500, MGNR or NANR?

MGNR has 21% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NANR has 47%, so MGNR differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, MGNR or NANR?

MGNR charges 0.75% a year and NANR charges 0.35%, so NANR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

MGNR vs NANR: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

NANR holds 47.3% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and MGNR 21.3%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MGNR and NANR

Net assets: $842m on Jul 31, 2026 for American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF, and $814m on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF.

MGNR on its own →NANR on its own →

At a glance

21.3%

MGNR in the S&P 500

47.3%

NANR in the S&P 500

+21.7%

MGNR total return, 1 year

+39.4%

NANR total return, 1 year

MGNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 79% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

21% of MGNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

NANR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 53% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

47% of NANR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

NANR costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.7 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MGNR vs NANR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	MGNR	NANR
Return
Measure	MGNR	NANR
Total return, 1 year	+21.7%	+39.4%
Drawdown
Measure	MGNR	NANR
Below its all-time high	16.0%, high on Jun 2, 2026	7.6%, high on Aug 21, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	MGNR	NANR
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+32.9%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 11.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	MGNR	NANR
Expense ratio	0.75%	0.35%
Net assets, MGNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and NANR as of Nov 3, 2026	$842m	$814m
Holdings
Measure	MGNR	NANR
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: MGNR vs NANR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	MGNR	NANR	MGNR	NANR
3 months	−6.7%	+3.3%	−8.1 pts vs GNR	not measured
6 months	−12.8%	+2.1%	−13.2 pts vs GNR	not measured
1 year	+21.7%	+39.4%	−11.2 pts vs GNR	not measured
3 years	–	+75.2%	–	not measured
Since launchNot the same days: MGNR Feb 2024 · NANR Dec 2015	+98.8%	+337.7%	+45.6 pts vs GNR	not measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF · Holds 40 stocks in natural resources, 21% of its weight in S&P 500 companies NANR State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF · Holds 202 stocks in natural resources, 47% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer American Beacon State Street

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 21.3% 47.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.6% 97.5%

In the Nasdaq-100 2.3% 1.6%

Holdings 40 202

Top ten, share of the fund 41.3% 41.2%

Expense ratio 0.75% 0.35%

Fee for the differing part 0.75% 0.36%

Total return, 1 year +21.7% +39.4%

vs its benchmark −11.2 pts vs GNR not measured

Below its high −16.0% −7.6%

Net assets, MGNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and NANR as of Nov 3, 2026 $842m $814m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

MGNR

By weight, 21% of MGNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 40 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested against +32.9% for its benchmark, the S&P Global Natural Resources Index, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. It sits 16.0% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

NANR

By weight, 47% of NANR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 202 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +39.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Aug 21, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, MGNR or NANR?: MGNR has 21% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NANR has 47%, so MGNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, MGNR or NANR?: MGNR charges 0.75% a year and NANR charges 0.35%, so NANR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

MGNR vs GNR MGNR vs FTRI MGNR vs CSNR MGNR vs FTWO NANR vs FTWO NANR vs CCNR NANR vs TURF NANR vs GNR

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →MGNR on its own →NANR on its own →MGNR dividend history →NANR dividend history →NANR holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

MGNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MGNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

American Beacon website ↗

NANR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

NANR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MGNR against NANR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/mgnr-vs-nanr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.