Which is more different from the S&P 500, NANR or TURF?

NANR has 47% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so TURF differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, NANR or TURF?

NANR charges 0.35% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so NANR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

NANR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

NANR holds 47.3% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and TURF 30.2%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about NANR and TURF

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $814m for State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF and $335m for T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF.

NANR on its own →TURF on its own →

At a glance

47.3%

NANR in the S&P 500

30.2%

TURF in the S&P 500

+39.4%

NANR total return, 1 year

+25.6%

TURF total return, 1 year

NANR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 53% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

47% of NANR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

TURF · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 70% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

30% of TURF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 70% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

NANR costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.8 points; NANR is 2.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

NANR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	NANR	TURF
Return
Measure	NANR	TURF
Total return, 1 year	+39.4%	+25.6%
Drawdown
Measure	NANR	TURF
Below its all-time high	7.6%, high on Aug 21, 2026	9.3%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	NANR	TURF
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+26.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 1.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	NANR	TURF
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.44%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$814m	$335m
Holdings
Measure	NANR	TURF
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: NANR vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	NANR	TURF	NANR	TURF
3 months	+3.3%	+0.3%	not measured	−1.0 pts vs GUNR
6 months	+2.1%	−5.5%	not measured	−3.0 pts vs GUNR
1 year	+39.4%	+25.6%	not measured	−1.2 pts vs GUNR
3 years	+75.2%	–	not measured	–
Since launchNot the same days: NANR Dec 2015 · TURF Jun 2025	+337.7%	+33.5%	not measured	−2.5 pts vs GUNR

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

NANR State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF · Holds 202 stocks in natural resources, 47% of its weight in S&P 500 companies TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF · Holds 84 stocks in natural resources, 30% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer State Street T. Rowe Price

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 47.3% 30.2%

Active share vs the S&P 500 97.5% 97.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 1.6% 0.7%

Holdings 202 84

Top ten, share of the fund 41.2% 36.7%

Expense ratio 0.35% 0.44%

Fee for the differing part 0.36% 0.45%

Total return, 1 year +39.4% +25.6%

vs its benchmark not measured −1.2 pts vs GUNR

Below its high −7.6% −9.3%

Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $814m $335m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

NANR

By weight, 47% of NANR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 202 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +39.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Aug 21, 2026.

TURF

By weight, 30% of TURF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 84 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested against +26.8% for its benchmark, the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Net, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. It sits 9.3% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, NANR or TURF?: NANR has 47% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so TURF differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NANR or TURF?: NANR charges 0.35% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so NANR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

NANR vs NRES NANR vs HAP NANR vs CCNR NANR vs IGE TURF vs IGE TURF vs MGNR TURF vs CCNR TURF vs HAP

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →NANR on its own →TURF on its own →NANR dividend history →NANR holdings →TURF dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

NANR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

NANR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

TURF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

TURF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

T. Rowe Price website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, NANR against TURF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nanr-vs-turf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.