Which is more different from the S&P 500, HAP or TURF?

HAP has 39% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so TURF differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, HAP or TURF?

HAP charges 0.41% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so HAP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

HAP vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

HAP holds 39.0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and TURF 30.2%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HAP and TURF

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $321m for VanEck Natural Resources ETF and $335m for T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF.

HAP on its own →TURF on its own →

At a glance

39.0%

HAP in the S&P 500

30.2%

TURF in the S&P 500

+34.3%

HAP total return, 1 year

+25.6%

TURF total return, 1 year

HAP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 61% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

39% of HAP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.

TURF · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 70% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

30% of TURF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 70% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

HAP costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.7 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

HAP vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	HAP	TURF
Return
Measure	HAP	TURF
Total return, 1 year	+34.3%	+25.6%
Drawdown
Measure	HAP	TURF
Below its all-time high	5.9%, high on Sep 9, 2026	9.3%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	HAP	TURF
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+15.0%	+26.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	ahead by 19.3 pts	behind by 1.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	HAP	TURF
Expense ratio	0.41%	0.44%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$321m	$335m
Holdings
Measure	HAP	TURF
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: HAP vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	HAP	TURF	HAP	TURF
3 months	+2.5%	+0.3%	+3.8 pts vs ACWI	−1.0 pts vs GUNR
6 months	+0.3%	−5.5%	−2.3 pts vs ACWI	−3.0 pts vs GUNR
1 year	+34.3%	+25.6%	+19.3 pts vs ACWI	−1.2 pts vs GUNR
3 years	+65.2%	–	−12.4 pts vs ACWI	–
Since launchNot the same days: HAP Sep 2008 · TURF Jun 2025	+196.0%	+33.5%	not measured	−2.5 pts vs GUNR

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF · Holds 140 stocks in natural resources, 39% of its weight in S&P 500 companies TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF · Holds 84 stocks in natural resources, 30% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer VanEck T. Rowe Price

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 39.0% 30.2%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.0% 97.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.7% 0.7%

Holdings 140 84

Top ten, share of the fund 38.4% 36.7%

Expense ratio 0.41% 0.44%

Fee for the differing part 0.43% 0.45%

Total return, 1 year +34.3% +25.6%

vs its benchmark +19.3 pts vs ACWI −1.2 pts vs GUNR

Below its high −5.9% −9.3%

Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $321m $335m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

HAP

By weight, 39% of HAP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 140 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +34.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 19.3 pts. It sits 5.9% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

TURF

By weight, 30% of TURF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 84 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested against +26.8% for its benchmark, the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Net, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. It sits 9.3% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, HAP or TURF?: HAP has 39% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so TURF differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, HAP or TURF?: HAP charges 0.41% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so HAP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

HAP vs NRES HAP vs CCNR HAP vs IGE HAP vs NANR TURF vs CCNR TURF vs FTRI TURF vs CSNR TURF vs FTWO

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →HAP on its own →TURF on its own →HAP dividend history →HAP holdings →TURF dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

HAP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

HAP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

VanEck website ↗

TURF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

TURF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

T. Rowe Price website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HAP against TURF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/hap-vs-turf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.