IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

CCNR vs HAP: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CCNR returned +25.6% to HAP's +34.3%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CCNR and HAP

Net assets: $427m on Jul 31, 2026 for ALPS | CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF, and $321m on Nov 3, 2026 for VanEck Natural Resources ETF.

CCNR on its own →HAP on its own →
At a glance
8.9%
CCNR in the S&P 500
39.0%
HAP in the S&P 500
+25.6%
CCNR total return, 1 year
+34.3%
HAP total return, 1 year
CCNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of CCNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.9%91%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 11% of the fund · 310 holdings as filed for Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of CCNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.9%91%9% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

9% of CCNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

HAP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 61% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
61% of its weight is outside the S&P 50039% of HAP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.39%61%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 38% of the fund · 140 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 2, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 1% in61% of its weight is outside the S&P 50039% of HAP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.39%61%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 96% · Nasdaq-100: 1% in

39% of HAP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CCNR costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.7 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CCNR vs HAP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureCCNRHAP
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.6%+34.3%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high12.1%, high on Sep 9, 20265.9%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNatural resourcesNatural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 19.3 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.41%
Net assets, CCNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and HAP as of Nov 3, 2026$427m$321m
Holdings
Holdings in common21%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund10%38%

Method

What they share

21%

By the books each fund has filed, CCNR and HAP hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

21% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CCNR HAP
Bhp Group Ltd 1.19% 2.72%
Nutrien Ltd 0.97% 2.19%
Vestas Wind Systems A/s 0.71% 0.83%
Bunge Global Sa 0.69% 0.70%
Grupo Mexico Sab De Cv 0.65% 0.73%
Archer-daniels-midland Co 0.64% 1.64%
Kubota Corp 0.63% 1.27%
Eni Spa 0.95% 0.63%
Yara International Asa 0.96% 0.61%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 0.60% 0.83%
Suncor Energy Inc 0.57% 0.85%
Teck Resources Ltd 0.54% 0.60%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CCNR
Murphy Oil Corp 1.18%
Inpex Corp 1.11%
Baytex Energy Corp 1.01%
Northland Power Inc 0.95%
Kurita Water Industries Ltd 0.94%
Saipem Spa 0.93%
Fortescue Ltd 0.92%
Chord Energy Corp 0.91%
Only in HAP
Exxon Mobil Corp 5.80%
Chevron Corp 5.66%
Bayer Ag 3.87%
Nextera Energy Inc 3.66%
Shell Plc 2.49%
Vylor Inc 2.35%
Newmont Corp 1.62%
Rio Tinto Plc 1.48%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: CCNR vs HAP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowCCNRHAPCCNRHAP
3 months−3.6%+2.5%not measured+3.8 pts vs ACWI
6 months−9.6%+0.3%not measured−2.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year+25.6%+34.3%not measured+19.3 pts vs ACWI
3 years–+65.2%–−12.4 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: CCNR Jul 2024 · HAP Sep 2008+53.5%+196.0%not measurednot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CCNR ALPS | CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF · Holds 310 stocks in natural resources, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF · Holds 140 stocks in natural resources, 39% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer ALPS VanEck
Theme Natural resources Natural resources
In the S&P 500 8.9% 39.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.6% 96.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.2% 0.7%
Holdings 310 140
Top ten, share of the fund 10.5% 38.4%
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.41%
Fee for the differing part 0.40% 0.43%
Total return, 1 year +25.6% +34.3%
vs its benchmark not measured +19.3 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −12.1% −5.9%
Net assets, CCNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and HAP as of Nov 3, 2026 $427m $321m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

21% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

HAP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CCNR

By weight, 9% of CCNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 10% of the fund across 310 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 12.1% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

HAP

By weight, 39% of HAP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 140 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +34.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 19.3 pts. It sits 5.9% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do CCNR and HAP hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CCNR or HAP?
CCNR has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and HAP has 39%, so CCNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CCNR or HAP?
CCNR charges 0.39% a year and HAP charges 0.41%, so CCNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CCNR vs FTWOCCNR vs NRESCCNR vs TURFCCNR vs IGEHAP vs TURFHAP vs IGEHAP vs NANRHAP vs MGNR
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CCNR on its own →HAP on its own →CCNR dividend history →CCNR holdings →HAP dividend history →HAP holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
CCNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
CCNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
ALPS website ↗
HAP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
HAP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
VanEck website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CCNR against HAP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ccnr-vs-hap

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.