IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

CCNR vs FTWO: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CCNR returned +25.6% to FTWO's +14.6%; 9% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CCNR and FTWO

Net assets: $427m on Jul 31, 2026 for ALPS | CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF, and $73m on Jun 30, 2026 for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF.

CCNR on its own →FTWO on its own →
At a glance
8.9%
CCNR in the S&P 500
67.8%
FTWO in the S&P 500
+25.6%
CCNR total return, 1 year
+14.6%
FTWO total return, 1 year
CCNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of CCNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.9%91%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 11% of the fund · 310 holdings as filed for Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of CCNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.9%91%9% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

9% of CCNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

FTWO · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 32% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
32% of its weight is outside the S&P 50068% of FTWO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 32% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.68%32%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 55% of the fund · 50 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 9% in32% of its weight is outside the S&P 50068% of FTWO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 32% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.68%32%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 95% · Nasdaq-100: 9% in

68% of FTWO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 32% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CCNR costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.0 points.

CCNR vs FTWO: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureCCNRFTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.6%+14.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high12.1%, high on Sep 9, 202610.6%, high on Mar 2, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNatural resourcesNatural resources
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.49%
Net assets, CCNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and FTWO as of Jun 30, 2026$427m$73m
Holdings
Holdings in common9%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund10%55%

Method

What they share

9%

By the books each fund has filed, CCNR and FTWO hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

9% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CCNR FTWO
Nutrien Ltd 0.97% 2.14%
Corteva Inc 0.96% 4.01%
Eog Resources Inc 0.97% 0.80%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 0.60% 0.92%
Suncor Energy Inc 0.57% 0.74%
Slb Ltd 0.55% 0.80%
Teck Resources Ltd 0.54% 1.04%
Nexgen Energy Ltd 0.54% 0.61%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 0.52% 2.83%
Uranium Energy Corp 0.46% 0.53%
Ingredion Inc 0.65% 0.43%
Freeport-mcmoran Inc 0.43% 3.28%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CCNR
Bhp Group Ltd 1.19%
Murphy Oil Corp 1.18%
Boliden Ab 1.15%
Inpex Corp 1.11%
Equinor Asa 1.04%
Baytex Energy Corp 1.01%
Yara International Asa 0.96%
Eni Spa 0.95%
Only in FTWO
Constellation Energy Corp 7.98%
Exxon Mobil Corp 6.55%
GE AEROSPACE 6.11%
Cameco Corp 4.56%
RTX Corp 4.01%
Newmont Corp 3.64%
Chevron Corp 3.55%
Boeing Co 2.68%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: CCNR vs FTWO: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowCCNRFTWO
3 months−3.6%−2.3%
6 months−9.6%−4.7%
1 year+25.6%+14.6%
3 years–+89.5%
Since launchNot the same days: CCNR Jul 2024 · FTWO Aug 2023+53.5%+82.2%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CCNR ALPS | CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF · Holds 310 stocks in natural resources, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF · Holds 50 stocks in natural resources, 68% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer ALPS Strive
Theme Natural resources Natural resources
In the S&P 500 8.9% 67.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.6% 95.1%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.2% 8.9%
Holdings 310 50
Top ten, share of the fund 10.5% 54.9%
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.49%
Fee for the differing part 0.40% 0.52%
Total return, 1 year +25.6% +14.6%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −12.1% −10.6%
Net assets, CCNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and FTWO as of Jun 30, 2026 $427m $73m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

9% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CCNR

By weight, 9% of CCNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 10% of the fund across 310 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 12.1% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

FTWO

By weight, 68% of FTWO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +14.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 10.6% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do CCNR and FTWO hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CCNR or FTWO?
CCNR has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and FTWO has 68%, so CCNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CCNR or FTWO?
CCNR charges 0.39% a year and FTWO charges 0.49%, so CCNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CCNR vs FTRICCNR vs MGNRCCNR vs GNRCCNR vs GUNRFTWO vs TURFFTWO vs HAPFTWO vs IGEFTWO vs NANR
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CCNR on its own →FTWO on its own →CCNR dividend history →CCNR holdings →FTWO dividend history →FTWO holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
CCNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
CCNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
ALPS website ↗
FTWO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
FTWO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Strive website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CCNR against FTWO, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ccnr-vs-ftwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.