Which is more different from the S&P 500, CCNR or MGNR?

CCNR has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and MGNR has 21%, so MGNR differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CCNR or MGNR?

CCNR charges 0.39% a year and MGNR charges 0.75%, so CCNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

CCNR vs MGNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

MGNR holds 21.3% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and CCNR 8.9%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CCNR and MGNR

Net assets on Jul 31, 2026: $427m for ALPS | CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF and $842m for American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF.

CCNR on its own →MGNR on its own →

At a glance

8.9%

CCNR in the S&P 500

21.3%

MGNR in the S&P 500

+25.6%

CCNR total return, 1 year

+21.7%

MGNR total return, 1 year

CCNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

9% of CCNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

MGNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 79% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

21% of MGNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CCNR costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.9 points; MGNR is 2.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CCNR vs MGNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	CCNR	MGNR
Return
Measure	CCNR	MGNR
Total return, 1 year	+25.6%	+21.7%
Drawdown
Measure	CCNR	MGNR
Below its all-time high	12.1%, high on Sep 9, 2026	16.0%, high on Jun 2, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	CCNR	MGNR
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+32.9%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 11.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	CCNR	MGNR
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.75%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026	$427m	$842m
Holdings
Measure	CCNR	MGNR
Holdings in common	not published
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	10%	41%

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CCNR vs MGNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	CCNR	MGNR	CCNR	MGNR
3 months	−3.6%	−6.7%	not measured	−8.1 pts vs GNR
6 months	−9.6%	−12.8%	not measured	−13.2 pts vs GNR
1 year	+25.6%	+21.7%	not measured	−11.2 pts vs GNR
Since launchNot the same days: CCNR Jul 2024 · MGNR Feb 2024	+53.5%	+98.8%	not measured	+45.6 pts vs GNR

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CCNR ALPS | CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF · Holds 310 stocks in natural resources, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF · Holds 40 stocks in natural resources, 21% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer ALPS American Beacon

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 8.9% 21.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.6% 99.6%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.2% 2.3%

Holdings 310 40

Top ten, share of the fund 10.5% 41.3%

Expense ratio 0.39% 0.75%

Fee for the differing part 0.40% 0.75%

Total return, 1 year +25.6% +21.7%

vs its benchmark not measured −11.2 pts vs GNR

Below its high −12.1% −16.0%

Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 $427m $842m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

CCNR

By weight, 9% of CCNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 10% of the fund across 310 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 12.1% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

MGNR

By weight, 21% of MGNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 40 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested against +32.9% for its benchmark, the S&P Global Natural Resources Index, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. It sits 16.0% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CCNR or MGNR?: CCNR has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and MGNR has 21%, so MGNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CCNR or MGNR?: CCNR charges 0.39% a year and MGNR charges 0.75%, so CCNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CCNR vs IGE CCNR vs HAP CCNR vs GNR CCNR vs FTRI MGNR vs TURF MGNR vs NANR MGNR vs NRES MGNR vs HAP

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CCNR on its own →MGNR on its own →CCNR dividend history →CCNR holdings →MGNR dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CCNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CCNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ALPS website ↗

MGNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MGNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

American Beacon website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CCNR against MGNR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ccnr-vs-mgnr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.