Do BATT and LITP hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or LITP?

BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LITP has 10%, so LITP differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, BATT or LITP?

BATT charges 0.59% a year and LITP charges 0.65%, so BATT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

BATT vs LITP: which is really different?

BATT and LITP hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and BATT returned +12.1% over the year. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.

15.6%

BATT in the S&P 500

9.7%

LITP in the S&P 500

+12.1%

BATT total return, 1 year

+9.9%

LITP total return, 1 year

BATT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index

LITP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202690% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

10% of LITP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 90% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · LITP scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

BATT 49.3

LITP 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BATT and LITP hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 1, 2026.

50%

half

8% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BATT LITP

Albemarle Corp 1.56% 9.67%

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 1.44% 10.90%

PLS Group Ltd 1.33% 9.44%

Ganfeng Lithium Group Co Ltd 1.18% 9.88%

Tianqi Lithium Corp 1.13% 4.43%

IGO LTD 1.04% 4.55%

Only in BATT

Tesla Inc 7.73%

BHP Group Ltd 6.90%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc 6.32%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd 5.37%

Bloom Energy Corp 5.25%

BYD Co Ltd 4.47%

Grupo Mexico SAB de CV 3.04%

TDK Corp 2.86%

Only in LITP

Liontown Ltd 8.46%

Lithium Argentina Ag 4.89%

Lithium Americas Corp 4.55%

Elevra Lithium Ltd 4.41%

Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd 3.56%

Sigma Lithium Corp 3.33%

Pmet Resources Inc 3.15%

Standard Lithium Ltd 2.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

8% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	BATT	LITP	BATT	LITP	BATT	LITP
3 months	−6.7%	−26.2%	−9.2 pts	−28.7 pts	−8.8 pts	−28.3 pts
6 months	−4.9%	−31.9%	−21.9 pts	−48.8 pts	−31.8 pts	−58.7 pts
1 year	+12.1%	+9.9%	−3.6 pts	−5.8 pts	−11.7 pts	−13.8 pts
3 years	+37.5%	−25.8%	−47.5 pts	−110.8 pts	−72.5 pts	−135.8 pts
Since launch BATT Jun 2018 · LITP Feb 2023	−15.2%	−46.8%	−228.1 pts	−138.7 pts	−359.8 pts	−189.2 pts

BATT and LITP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BATT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF · Holds 57 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

LITP

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF · Holds 38 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 10% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Amplify Sprott

Theme Lithium and battery metals Lithium and battery metals

In the S&P 500 15.6% 9.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.0% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 7.7% 0.0%

Holdings 57 38

Top ten, share of the fund 47.1% 71.2%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.65%

Total return, 1 year +12.1% +9.9%

vs the S&P 500 −3.6 pts −5.8 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −11.7 pts −13.8 pts

Below its high −20.7% −49.3%

Net assets $112m $33m

BATT and LITP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BATT in plain words

By weight, 16% of BATT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. It sits 20.7% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

LITP in plain words

By weight, 10% of LITP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 71% of the fund across 38 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. It sits 49.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BATT and LITP hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or LITP?: BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LITP has 10%, so LITP differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BATT or LITP?: BATT charges 0.59% a year and LITP charges 0.65%, so BATT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BATT vs LIT BATT vs WATS BATT vs CABZ BATT vs DRIV LITP vs CABZ LITP vs DRIV LITP vs EVMT LITP vs WATS

BATT on its own →LITP on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BATT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BATT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Amplify page for BATT ↗LITP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LITP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Sprott page for LITP ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BATT against LITP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/batt-vs-litp

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.