Do BATT and ILIT hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or ILIT?

BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ILIT has 8%, so ILIT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, BATT or ILIT?

BATT charges 0.59% a year and ILIT charges 0.47%, so ILIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

BATT vs ILIT: which is really different?

BATT and ILIT hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and BATT returned +12.1% over the year. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF and iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF.

15.6%

BATT in the S&P 500

7.9%

ILIT in the S&P 500

+12.1%

BATT total return, 1 year

+7.0%

ILIT total return, 1 year

BATT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index

ILIT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202692% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

8% of ILIT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · ILIT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

BATT 49.3

ILIT 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BATT and ILIT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 29, 2026.

50%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BATT ILIT

Albemarle Corp 1.56% 7.88%

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 1.44% 8.15%

PLS Group Ltd 1.33% 6.91%

AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR 0.05% 0.22%

Only in BATT

Tesla Inc 7.73%

BHP Group Ltd 6.90%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc 6.32%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd 5.37%

Bloom Energy Corp 5.25%

BYD Co Ltd 4.47%

Grupo Mexico SAB de CV 3.04%

TDK Corp 2.86%

Only in ILIT

LIONTOWN LTD 7.07%

LITHIUM AMERICAS 4.73%

COSMOAM&T LTD 3.93%

ELEVRA LITHIUM LTD 3.74%

LITHIUM ARGENTINA AG 3.69%

CORE LITHIUM LTD 3.59%

GANFENG LITHIUM GROUP LTD A 3.11%

SIGMA LITHIUM 3.11%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	BATT	ILIT	BATT	ILIT	BATT	ILIT
3 months	−6.7%	−27.4%	−9.2 pts	−29.9 pts	−8.8 pts	−29.5 pts
6 months	−4.9%	−26.2%	−21.9 pts	−43.2 pts	−31.8 pts	−53.1 pts
1 year	+12.1%	+7.0%	−3.6 pts	−8.7 pts	−11.7 pts	−16.7 pts
3 years	+37.5%	−24.5%	−47.5 pts	−109.5 pts	−72.5 pts	−134.5 pts
Since launch BATT Jun 2018 · ILIT Jun 2023	−15.2%	−42.3%	−228.1 pts	−125.5 pts	−359.8 pts	−150.1 pts

BATT and ILIT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BATT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF · Holds 57 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

ILIT

iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF · Holds 62 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Amplify iShares

Theme Lithium and battery metals Lithium and battery metals

In the S&P 500 15.6% 7.9%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.0% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 7.7% 0.0%

Holdings 57 62

Top ten, share of the fund 47.1% 52.8%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.47%

Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.47%

Total return, 1 year +12.1% +7.0%

vs the S&P 500 −3.6 pts −8.7 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −11.7 pts −16.7 pts

Below its high −20.7% −46.7%

Net assets $112m $13m

BATT and ILIT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BATT in plain words

By weight, 16% of BATT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. It sits 20.7% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

ILIT in plain words

By weight, 8% of ILIT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 62 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 29, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 8.7 pts. It sits 46.7% below its all-time high of Jul 13, 2023.

Questions people ask

Do BATT and ILIT hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or ILIT?: BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ILIT has 8%, so ILIT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BATT or ILIT?: BATT charges 0.59% a year and ILIT charges 0.47%, so ILIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BATT vs IDRV BATT vs LIT BATT vs LITP BATT vs WATS ILIT vs ION ILIT vs KARS ILIT vs LIMI ILIT vs LIT

BATT on its own →ILIT on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BATT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BATT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Amplify page for BATT ↗ILIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ILIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for ILIT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BATT against ILIT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/batt-vs-ilit

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.