Do BATT and ION hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or ION?

BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ION has 3%, so ION differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, BATT or ION?

BATT charges 0.59% a year and ION charges 0.58%, so ION is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

BATT vs ION: which is really different?

BATT and ION hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and ION returned +18.9% over the year. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF and ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF.

15.6%

BATT in the S&P 500

2.6%

ION in the S&P 500

+12.1%

BATT total return, 1 year

+18.9%

ION total return, 1 year

BATT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index

ION · 1 year to Sep 30, 202697% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

3% of ION's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 97% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · ION scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

BATT 49.3

ION 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BATT and ION hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

12% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BATT ION

First Quantum Minerals Ltd 1.86% 2.33%

Lundin Mining Corp 1.72% 1.97%

Albemarle Corp 1.56% 2.62%

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 1.44% 2.88%

PLS Group Ltd 1.33% 2.90%

Mineral Resources Ltd 1.19% 2.51%

IGO LTD 1.04% 3.74%

MMG Ltd 1.24% 0.39%

BHP Group Ltd 6.90% 0.08%

Only in BATT

Tesla Inc 7.73%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc 6.32%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd 5.37%

Bloom Energy Corp 5.25%

BYD Co Ltd 4.47%

Grupo Mexico SAB de CV 3.04%

TDK Corp 2.86%

Teck Resources Ltd 2.64%

Only in ION

PACIFIC METALS CO LTD 5.04%

PT TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK 3.55%

VALE INDONESIA TBK 3.39%

SIGMA LITHIUM CORP 3.19%

ERAMET 2.93%

TIBET MINERAL DEVELOPMENT-A 2.93%

AFRICAN RAINBOW MINERALS LTD 2.88%

ANTAM PERSERO TBK PT 2.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

12% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	BATT	ION	BATT	ION	BATT	ION
3 months	−6.7%	−10.4%	−9.2 pts	−12.9 pts	−8.8 pts	−12.5 pts
6 months	−4.9%	−19.6%	−21.9 pts	−36.6 pts	−31.8 pts	−46.5 pts
1 year	+12.1%	+18.9%	−3.6 pts	+3.1 pts	−11.7 pts	−4.9 pts
3 years	+37.5%	+48.5%	−47.5 pts	−36.5 pts	−72.5 pts	−61.5 pts
Since launch BATT Jun 2018 · ION Dec 2022	−15.2%	+16.1%	−228.1 pts	−81.1 pts	−359.8 pts	−141.7 pts

BATT and ION over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BATT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF · Holds 57 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

ION

ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF · Holds 53 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 3% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Amplify ProShares

Theme Lithium and battery metals Lithium and battery metals

In the S&P 500 15.6% 2.6%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.0% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 7.7% 0.0%

Holdings 57 53

Top ten, share of the fund 47.1% 33.4%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.58%

Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.58%

Total return, 1 year +12.1% +18.9%

vs the S&P 500 −3.6 pts +3.1 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −11.7 pts −4.9 pts

Below its high −20.7% −32.9%

Net assets $112m $12m

BATT and ION on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BATT in plain words

By weight, 16% of BATT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. It sits 20.7% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

ION in plain words

By weight, 3% of ION's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 53 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 3.1 pts. It sits 32.9% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BATT and ION hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or ION?: BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ION has 3%, so ION differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BATT or ION?: BATT charges 0.59% a year and ION charges 0.58%, so ION is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BATT vs HAIL BATT vs IDRV BATT vs ILIT BATT vs KARS ION vs KARS ION vs LIMI ION vs LIT ION vs LITP

BATT on its own →ION on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BATT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BATT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Amplify page for BATT ↗ION filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ION prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for ION ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BATT against ION, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/batt-vs-ion

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.