Do BATT and LIT hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or LIT?

BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LIT has 9%, so LIT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, BATT or LIT?

BATT charges 0.59% a year and LIT charges 0.75%, so BATT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

BATT vs LIT: which is really different?

BATT and LIT hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and LIT returned +21.2% over the year. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF.

15.6%

BATT in the S&P 500

8.6%

LIT in the S&P 500

+12.1%

BATT total return, 1 year

+21.2%

LIT total return, 1 year

BATT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index

LIT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202691% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

9% of LIT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · LIT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

BATT 49.3

LIT 51.3

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BATT and LIT hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

21% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BATT LIT

Tesla Inc 7.73% 4.39%

TDK Corp 2.86% 5.73%

Samsung SDI Co Ltd 2.47% 5.65%

Albemarle Corp 1.56% 4.17%

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 1.44% 3.09%

Ecopro BM Co Ltd 1.35% 1.43%

EnerSys 1.33% 2.24%

PLS Group Ltd 1.33% 2.64%

Mineral Resources Ltd 1.19% 2.07%

IGO LTD 1.04% 1.02%

AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR 0.05% 0.03%

Only in BATT

BHP Group Ltd 6.90%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc 6.32%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd 5.37%

Bloom Energy Corp 5.25%

BYD Co Ltd 4.47%

Grupo Mexico SAB de CV 3.04%

Teck Resources Ltd 2.64%

Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd 1.95%

Only in LIT

RIO TINTO PLC-SPON ADR 22.75%

PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION 7.32%

NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO-A 6.37%

LG ENERGY SOLUTION 4.17%

EVE ENERGY CO LTD-A 3.33%

BYD CO LTD-H 3.21%

CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHN-A 3.14%

GANFENG LITHIUM GROUP CO L-A 2.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

21% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	BATT	LIT	BATT	LIT	BATT	LIT
3 months	−6.7%	−12.3%	−9.2 pts	−14.8 pts	−8.8 pts	−14.4 pts
6 months	−4.9%	−7.7%	−21.9 pts	−24.7 pts	−31.8 pts	−34.6 pts
1 year	+12.1%	+21.2%	−3.6 pts	+5.5 pts	−11.7 pts	−2.6 pts
3 years	+37.5%	+27.4%	−47.5 pts	−57.6 pts	−72.5 pts	−82.6 pts
Since launch BATT Jun 2018 · LIT Jul 2010	−15.2%	+159.4%	−228.1 pts	−661.0 pts	−359.8 pts	−1587.0 pts

BATT and LIT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BATT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF · Holds 57 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF · Holds 48 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Amplify Global X

Theme Lithium and battery metals Lithium and battery metals

In the S&P 500 15.6% 8.6%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.0% 98.1%

In the Nasdaq-100 7.7% 4.4%

Holdings 57 48

Top ten, share of the fund 47.1% 67.1%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.75%

Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.76%

Total return, 1 year +12.1% +21.2%

vs the S&P 500 −3.6 pts +5.5 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −11.7 pts −2.6 pts

Below its high −20.7% −26.0%

Net assets $112m $1.4bn

BATT and LIT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BATT in plain words

By weight, 16% of BATT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. It sits 20.7% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

LIT in plain words

By weight, 9% of LIT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 67% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.5 pts. It sits 26.0% below its all-time high of Nov 8, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do BATT and LIT hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or LIT?: BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LIT has 9%, so LIT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BATT or LIT?: BATT charges 0.59% a year and LIT charges 0.75%, so BATT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BATT vs LIMI BATT vs FDRV BATT vs HAIL BATT vs IDRV LIT vs CABZ LIT vs DRIV LIT vs LITP LIT vs WATS

BATT on its own →LIT on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BATT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BATT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Amplify page for BATT ↗LIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Global X page for LIT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BATT against LIT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/batt-vs-lit

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.