Do LIT and WATS hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, LIT or WATS?

LIT has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and WATS has 29%, so LIT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, LIT or WATS?

LIT charges 0.75% a year and WATS charges 0.35%, so WATS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

LIT vs WATS: which is really different?

LIT and WATS hold 13% of their weight in the same names. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF and Corgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETF.

8.6%

LIT in the S&P 500

28.9%

WATS in the S&P 500

+21.2%

LIT total return, 1 year

−24.9%

WATS total return, since launch

LIT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202691% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

9% of LIT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index

WATS · 3 months to Sep 30, 202671% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

29% of WATS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 71% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · LIT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

LIT 51.3

WATS 51.3

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LIT and WATS hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

13% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding LIT WATS

TESLA INC 4.39% 17.02%

ALBEMARLE CORP 4.17% 3.43%

QUIMICA Y MINERA CHIL-SP ADR 3.09% 4.01%

ENERSYS 2.24% 5.76%

Only in LIT

RIO TINTO PLC-SPON ADR 22.75%

PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION 7.32%

NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO-A 6.37%

TDK CORP 5.73%

SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD 5.65%

LG ENERGY SOLUTION 4.17%

EVE ENERGY CO LTD-A 3.33%

BYD CO LTD-H 3.21%

Only in WATS

Bloom Energy Corp 12.36%

Enphase Energy Inc 6.12%

Energy Vault Holdings Inc 4.58%

AES Corp/The 4.33%

Generac Holdings Inc 4.09%

Sunrun Inc 3.50%

Solid Power Inc 3.34%

SolarEdge Technologies Inc 3.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

13% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	LIT	WATS	LIT	WATS	LIT	WATS
3 months	−12.3%	−23.4%	−14.8 pts	−26.0 pts	−14.4 pts	−25.6 pts
6 months	−7.7%	not published	−24.7 pts	not published	−34.6 pts	not published
1 year	+21.2%	not published	+5.5 pts	not published	−2.6 pts	not published
3 years	+27.4%	not published	−57.6 pts	not published	−82.6 pts	not published
Since launch LIT Jul 2010 · WATS May 2026	+159.4%	−24.9%	−661.0 pts	−29.3 pts	−1587.0 pts	−31.4 pts

LIT and WATS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF · Holds 48 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

WATS

Corgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETF · Holds 24 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 29% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Global X Corgi

Theme Lithium and battery metals Electric vehicles and batteries

In the S&P 500 8.6% 28.9%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.1% 98.1%

In the Nasdaq-100 4.4% 17.0%

Holdings 48 24

Top ten, share of the fund 67.1% 65.2%

Expense ratio 0.75% 0.35%

Fee for the differing part 0.76% 0.36%

Total return, 1 year +21.2% −24.9% (since launch on May 6, 2026)

vs the S&P 500 +5.5 pts −29.3 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −2.6 pts −31.4 pts

Below its high −26.0% −38.3%

Net assets $1.4bn $496,218

LIT and WATS on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

LIT in plain words

By weight, 9% of LIT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 67% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.5 pts. It sits 26.0% below its all-time high of Nov 8, 2021.

WATS in plain words

By weight, 29% of WATS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 24 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on May 6, 2026 the fund returned −24.9% with distributions reinvested against +4.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 29.3 pts. It sits 38.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do LIT and WATS hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, LIT or WATS?: LIT has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and WATS has 29%, so LIT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, LIT or WATS?: LIT charges 0.75% a year and WATS charges 0.35%, so WATS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

LIT vs LITP LIT vs HAIL LIT vs IDRV LIT vs ILIT WATS vs ION WATS vs KARS WATS vs BATT WATS vs CABZ

LIT on its own →WATS on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

LIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Global X page for LIT ↗WATS filings on SEC EDGAR ↗WATS prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Corgi website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, LIT against WATS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lit-vs-wats

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.