Do CABZ and LIT hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CABZ or LIT?

CABZ has 38% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LIT has 9%, so LIT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CABZ or LIT?

CABZ charges 0.59% a year and LIT charges 0.75%, so CABZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

CABZ vs LIT: which is really different?

CABZ and LIT hold 4% of their weight in the same names. Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF.

37.6%

CABZ in the S&P 500

8.6%

LIT in the S&P 500

−20.2%

CABZ total return, since launch

+21.2%

LIT total return, 1 year

CABZ · 6 months to Sep 30, 202662% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

38% of CABZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 62% is outside the index

LIT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202691% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

9% of LIT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · LIT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

CABZ 20.3

LIT 51.3

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CABZ and LIT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding CABZ LIT

Tesla Inc 8.44% 4.39%

Only in CABZ

Alphabet Inc 6.19%

Uber Technologies Inc 5.46%

Baidu Inc 5.25%

WeRide Inc 5.05%

Pony AI Inc 4.72%

Ouster Inc 4.55%

NVIDIA Corp 4.49%

RoboSense Technology Co Ltd 4.31%

Only in LIT

RIO TINTO PLC-SPON ADR 22.75%

PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION 7.32%

NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO-A 6.37%

TDK CORP 5.73%

SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD 5.65%

ALBEMARLE CORP 4.17%

LG ENERGY SOLUTION 4.17%

EVE ENERGY CO LTD-A 3.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	CABZ	LIT	CABZ	LIT	CABZ	LIT
3 months	−17.2%	−12.3%	−19.7 pts	−14.8 pts	−19.3 pts	−14.4 pts
6 months	−3.7%	−7.7%	−20.7 pts	−24.7 pts	−30.6 pts	−34.6 pts
1 year	not published	+21.2%	not published	+5.5 pts	not published	−2.6 pts
3 years	not published	+27.4%	not published	−57.6 pts	not published	−82.6 pts
Since launch CABZ Jan 2026 · LIT Jul 2010	−20.2%	+159.4%	−31.5 pts	−661.0 pts	−40.0 pts	−1587.0 pts

CABZ and LIT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CABZ

Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF · Holds 30 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 38% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF · Holds 48 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill Global X

Theme Electric vehicles and batteries Lithium and battery metals

In the S&P 500 37.6% 8.6%

Active share vs the S&P 500 86.0% 98.1%

In the Nasdaq-100 25.2% 4.4%

Holdings 30 48

Top ten, share of the fund 52.6% 67.1%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.75%

Fee for the differing part 0.69% 0.76%

Total return, 1 year −20.2% (since launch on Jan 14, 2026) +21.2%

vs the S&P 500 −31.5 pts +5.5 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −40.0 pts −2.6 pts

Below its high −24.7% −26.0%

Net assets $3m $1.4bn

CABZ and LIT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CABZ in plain words

By weight, 38% of CABZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 30 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Jan 14, 2026 the fund returned −20.2% with distributions reinvested against +11.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 31.5 pts. It sits 24.7% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

LIT in plain words

By weight, 9% of LIT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 67% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.5 pts. It sits 26.0% below its all-time high of Nov 8, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do CABZ and LIT hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CABZ or LIT?: CABZ has 38% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LIT has 9%, so LIT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CABZ or LIT?: CABZ charges 0.59% a year and LIT charges 0.75%, so CABZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CABZ vs LIMI CABZ vs LITP CABZ vs WATS CABZ vs DRIV LIT vs LITP LIT vs WATS LIT vs DRIV LIT vs EVMT

CABZ on its own →LIT on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

CABZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CABZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Roundhill page for CABZ ↗LIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Global X page for LIT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CABZ against LIT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cabz-vs-lit

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.