Do BATT and CABZ hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or CABZ?

BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and CABZ has 38%, so BATT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, BATT or CABZ?

BATT charges 0.59% a year and CABZ charges 0.59%, so BATT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

BATT vs CABZ: which is really different?

BATT and CABZ hold 11% of their weight in the same names. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF and Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF.

15.6%

BATT in the S&P 500

37.6%

CABZ in the S&P 500

+12.1%

BATT total return, 1 year

−20.2%

CABZ total return, since launch

BATT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index

CABZ · 6 months to Sep 30, 202662% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

38% of CABZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 62% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · BATT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

BATT 49.3

CABZ 20.3

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BATT and CABZ hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

11% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BATT CABZ

Tesla Inc 7.73% 8.44%

BYD Co Ltd 4.47% 3.36%

Only in BATT

BHP Group Ltd 6.90%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc 6.32%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd 5.37%

Bloom Energy Corp 5.25%

Grupo Mexico SAB de CV 3.04%

TDK Corp 2.86%

Teck Resources Ltd 2.64%

Samsung SDI Co Ltd 2.47%

Only in CABZ

Alphabet Inc 6.19%

Uber Technologies Inc 5.46%

Baidu Inc 5.25%

WeRide Inc 5.05%

Pony AI Inc 4.72%

Ouster Inc 4.55%

NVIDIA Corp 4.49%

RoboSense Technology Co Ltd 4.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

11% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	BATT	CABZ	BATT	CABZ	BATT	CABZ
3 months	−6.7%	−17.2%	−9.2 pts	−19.7 pts	−8.8 pts	−19.3 pts
6 months	−4.9%	−3.7%	−21.9 pts	−20.7 pts	−31.8 pts	−30.6 pts
1 year	+12.1%	not published	−3.6 pts	not published	−11.7 pts	not published
3 years	+37.5%	not published	−47.5 pts	not published	−72.5 pts	not published
Since launch BATT Jun 2018 · CABZ Jan 2026	−15.2%	−20.2%	−228.1 pts	−31.5 pts	−359.8 pts	−40.0 pts

BATT and CABZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BATT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF · Holds 57 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

CABZ

Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF · Holds 30 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 38% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Amplify Roundhill

Theme Lithium and battery metals Electric vehicles and batteries

In the S&P 500 15.6% 37.6%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.0% 86.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 7.7% 25.2%

Holdings 57 30

Top ten, share of the fund 47.1% 52.6%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.59%

Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.69%

Total return, 1 year +12.1% −20.2% (since launch on Jan 14, 2026)

vs the S&P 500 −3.6 pts −31.5 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −11.7 pts −40.0 pts

Below its high −20.7% −24.7%

Net assets $112m $3m

BATT and CABZ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BATT in plain words

By weight, 16% of BATT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. It sits 20.7% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

CABZ in plain words

By weight, 38% of CABZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 30 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Jan 14, 2026 the fund returned −20.2% with distributions reinvested against +11.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 31.5 pts. It sits 24.7% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BATT and CABZ hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or CABZ?: BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and CABZ has 38%, so BATT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BATT or CABZ?: BATT charges 0.59% a year and CABZ charges 0.59%, so BATT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BATT vs DRIV BATT vs EVMT BATT vs FDRV BATT vs HAIL CABZ vs DRIV CABZ vs EVMT CABZ vs FDRV CABZ vs HAIL

BATT on its own →CABZ on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BATT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BATT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Amplify page for BATT ↗CABZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CABZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Roundhill page for CABZ ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BATT against CABZ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/batt-vs-cabz

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.