Do BATT and FDRV hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or FDRV?

BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and FDRV has 21%, so BATT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, BATT or FDRV?

BATT charges 0.59% a year and FDRV charges 0.39%, so FDRV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

BATT vs FDRV: which is really different?

BATT and FDRV hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and BATT returned +12.1% over the year. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF and Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF.

15.6%

BATT in the S&P 500

21.3%

FDRV in the S&P 500

+12.1%

BATT total return, 1 year

−8.2%

FDRV total return, 1 year

BATT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index

FDRV · 1 year to Sep 30, 202679% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

21% of FDRV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · BATT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

BATT 49.3

FDRV 42.8

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BATT and FDRV hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 1, 2026.

50%

half

22% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BATT FDRV

Tesla Inc 7.73% 4.95%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd 5.37% 4.78%

BYD Co Ltd 4.47% 3.88%

Rivian Automotive Inc 1.61% 3.83%

Li Auto Inc 1.18% 2.52%

Samsung SDI Co Ltd 2.47% 1.13%

NIO Inc 1.02% 2.92%

Ganfeng Lithium Group Co Ltd 1.18% 1.01%

Only in BATT

BHP Group Ltd 6.90%

Freeport-McMoRan Inc 6.32%

Bloom Energy Corp 5.25%

Grupo Mexico SAB de CV 3.04%

TDK Corp 2.86%

Teck Resources Ltd 2.64%

Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd 1.95%

Resonac Holdings Corp 1.87%

Only in FDRV

UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 4.92%

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 4.65%

NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 4.30%

ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS INC 3.61%

APTIV PLC 3.44%

AURORA INNOVATION INC 3.10%

AUTOLIV INC 2.83%

XPENG INC 2.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

22% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	BATT	FDRV	BATT	FDRV	BATT	FDRV
3 months	−6.7%	−16.6%	−9.2 pts	−19.1 pts	−8.8 pts	−18.7 pts
6 months	−4.9%	−2.9%	−21.9 pts	−19.9 pts	−31.8 pts	−29.8 pts
1 year	+12.1%	−8.2%	−3.6 pts	−23.9 pts	−11.7 pts	−31.9 pts
3 years	+37.5%	−4.0%	−47.5 pts	−89.0 pts	−72.5 pts	−114.0 pts
Since launch BATT Jun 2018 · FDRV Oct 2021	−15.2%	−35.6%	−228.1 pts	−121.5 pts	−359.8 pts	−145.5 pts

BATT and FDRV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BATT

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF · Holds 57 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

FDRV

Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF · Holds 50 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 21% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Amplify Fidelity

Theme Lithium and battery metals Electric vehicles and batteries

In the S&P 500 15.6% 21.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.0% 97.4%

In the Nasdaq-100 7.7% 9.7%

Holdings 57 50

Top ten, share of the fund 47.1% 41.5%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.39%

Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.40%

Total return, 1 year +12.1% −8.2%

vs the S&P 500 −3.6 pts −23.9 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −11.7 pts −31.9 pts

Below its high −20.7% −45.3%

Net assets $112m $25m

BATT and FDRV on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BATT in plain words

By weight, 16% of BATT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. It sits 20.7% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

FDRV in plain words

By weight, 21% of FDRV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −8.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 23.9 pts. It sits 45.3% below its all-time high of Nov 8, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do BATT and FDRV hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or FDRV?: BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and FDRV has 21%, so BATT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BATT or FDRV?: BATT charges 0.59% a year and FDRV charges 0.39%, so FDRV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BATT vs LITP BATT vs WATS BATT vs CABZ BATT vs DRIV FDRV vs HAIL FDRV vs IDRV FDRV vs ILIT FDRV vs ION

BATT on its own →FDRV on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BATT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BATT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Amplify page for BATT ↗FDRV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FDRV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Fidelity website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BATT against FDRV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/batt-vs-fdrv

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.