Do FDRV and LITP hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDRV or LITP?

FDRV has 21% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LITP has 10%, so LITP differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, FDRV or LITP?

FDRV charges 0.39% a year and LITP charges 0.65%, so FDRV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

FDRV vs LITP: which is really different?

FDRV and LITP hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and LITP returned +9.9% over the year. Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.

21.3%

FDRV in the S&P 500

9.7%

LITP in the S&P 500

−8.2%

FDRV total return, 1 year

+9.9%

LITP total return, 1 year

FDRV · 1 year to Sep 30, 202679% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

21% of FDRV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index

LITP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202690% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

10% of LITP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 90% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · LITP scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

FDRV 42.8

LITP 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDRV and LITP hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

50%

half

2% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding FDRV LITP

GANFENG LITHIUM GROUP CO LTD 1.01% 9.88%

Only in FDRV

TESLA INC 4.95%

UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 4.92%

CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 4.78%

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 4.65%

NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 4.30%

BYD CO LTD 3.88%

RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE INC 3.83%

ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS INC 3.61%

Only in LITP

Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile Sa 10.90%

Albemarle Corp 9.67%

Pls Group Ltd 9.44%

Liontown Ltd 8.46%

Lithium Argentina Ag 4.89%

Igo Ltd 4.55%

Lithium Americas Corp 4.55%

Tianqi Lithium Corp 4.43%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

2% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	FDRV	LITP	FDRV	LITP	FDRV	LITP
3 months	−16.6%	−26.2%	−19.1 pts	−28.7 pts	−18.7 pts	−28.3 pts
6 months	−2.9%	−31.9%	−19.9 pts	−48.8 pts	−29.8 pts	−58.7 pts
1 year	−8.2%	+9.9%	−23.9 pts	−5.8 pts	−31.9 pts	−13.8 pts
3 years	−4.0%	−25.8%	−89.0 pts	−110.8 pts	−114.0 pts	−135.8 pts
Since launch FDRV Oct 2021 · LITP Feb 2023	−35.6%	−46.8%	−121.5 pts	−138.7 pts	−145.5 pts	−189.2 pts

FDRV and LITP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

FDRV

Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF · Holds 50 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 21% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

LITP

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF · Holds 38 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 10% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Fidelity Sprott

Theme Electric vehicles and batteries Lithium and battery metals

In the S&P 500 21.3% 9.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 97.4% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 9.7% 0.0%

Holdings 50 38

Top ten, share of the fund 41.5% 71.2%

Expense ratio 0.39% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.40% 0.65%

Total return, 1 year −8.2% +9.9%

vs the S&P 500 −23.9 pts −5.8 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −31.9 pts −13.8 pts

Below its high −45.3% −49.3%

Net assets $25m $33m

FDRV and LITP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FDRV in plain words

By weight, 21% of FDRV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −8.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 23.9 pts. It sits 45.3% below its all-time high of Nov 8, 2021.

LITP in plain words

By weight, 10% of LITP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 71% of the fund across 38 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. It sits 49.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do FDRV and LITP hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDRV or LITP?: FDRV has 21% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LITP has 10%, so LITP differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FDRV or LITP?: FDRV charges 0.39% a year and LITP charges 0.65%, so FDRV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FDRV vs KARS FDRV vs LIMI FDRV vs LIT FDRV vs WATS LITP vs WATS LITP vs HAIL LITP vs IDRV LITP vs ILIT

FDRV on its own →LITP on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

FDRV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FDRV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Fidelity website ↗LITP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LITP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Sprott page for LITP ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, FDRV against LITP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdrv-vs-litp

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.