EVMT vs LIT: which is really different?

EVMT and LIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names. Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF.

0.0%
EVMT in the S&P 500
8.6%
LIT in the S&P 500
+20.8%
EVMT total return, 1 year
+21.2%
LIT total return, 1 year
EVMT · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of EVMT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 100% of the fund · 2 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of EVMT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 100% of the fund

0% of EVMT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

LIT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202691% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of LIT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index9%91%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 67% of the fund · 48 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 4% in91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of LIT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index9%91%9% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 67% of the fund

9% of LIT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · EVMT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EVMT and LIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding EVMT LIT
Only in EVMT
Invesco Premier US Government Money Portfolio 79.76%
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 20.24%
Only in LIT
RIO TINTO PLC-SPON ADR 22.75%
PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION 7.32%
NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO-A 6.37%
TDK CORP 5.73%
SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD 5.65%
TESLA INC 4.39%
ALBEMARLE CORP 4.17%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION 4.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowEVMTLITEVMTLITEVMTLIT
3 months+0.7%−12.3%−1.8 pts−14.8 pts−1.4 pts−14.4 pts
6 months−2.4%−7.7%−19.4 pts−24.7 pts−29.3 pts−34.6 pts
1 year+20.8%+21.2%+5.1 pts+5.5 pts−3.0 pts−2.6 pts
3 years+12.4%+27.4%−72.6 pts−57.6 pts−97.6 pts−82.6 pts
Since launch
EVMT Apr 2022 · LIT Jul 2010
−27.4%+159.4%−122.1 pts−661.0 pts−167.1 pts−1587.0 pts

EVMT and LIT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

EVMT
Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Holds 2 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF · Holds 48 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Invesco Global X
Theme Electric vehicles and batteries Lithium and battery metals
In the S&P 500 0.0% 8.6%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 98.1%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 4.4%
Holdings 2 48
Top ten, share of the fund 100.0% 67.1%
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.75%
Fee for the differing part 0.59% 0.76%
Total return, 1 year +20.8% +21.2%
vs the S&P 500 +5.1 pts +5.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −3.0 pts −2.6 pts
Below its high −28.6% −26.0%
Net assets $7m $1.4bn

EVMT and LIT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EVMT in plain words

By weight, 0% of EVMT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 2 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.1 pts. It sits 28.6% below its all-time high of Apr 27, 2022.

LIT in plain words

By weight, 9% of LIT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 67% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.5 pts. It sits 26.0% below its all-time high of Nov 8, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do EVMT and LIT hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, EVMT or LIT?
EVMT has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LIT has 9%, so EVMT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, EVMT or LIT?
EVMT charges 0.59% a year and LIT charges 0.75%, so EVMT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, EVMT against LIT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/evmt-vs-lit

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.