Do EVMT and LITP hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, EVMT or LITP?

EVMT has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LITP has 10%, so EVMT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, EVMT or LITP?

EVMT charges 0.59% a year and LITP charges 0.65%, so EVMT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

EVMT vs LITP: which is really different?

EVMT and LITP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EVMT returned +20.8% over the year. Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.

0.0%

EVMT in the S&P 500

9.7%

LITP in the S&P 500

+20.8%

EVMT total return, 1 year

+9.9%

LITP total return, 1 year

EVMT · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of EVMT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

LITP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202690% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

10% of LITP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 90% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · EVMT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

EVMT 92

LITP 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EVMT and LITP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding EVMT LITP

Only in EVMT

Invesco Premier US Government Money Portfolio 79.76%

POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 20.24%

Only in LITP

Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile Sa 10.90%

Ganfeng Lithium Group Co Ltd 9.88%

Albemarle Corp 9.67%

Pls Group Ltd 9.44%

Liontown Ltd 8.46%

Lithium Argentina Ag 4.89%

Igo Ltd 4.55%

Lithium Americas Corp 4.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	EVMT	LITP	EVMT	LITP	EVMT	LITP
3 months	+0.7%	−26.2%	−1.8 pts	−28.7 pts	−1.4 pts	−28.3 pts
6 months	−2.4%	−31.9%	−19.4 pts	−48.8 pts	−29.3 pts	−58.7 pts
1 year	+20.8%	+9.9%	+5.1 pts	−5.8 pts	−3.0 pts	−13.8 pts
3 years	+12.4%	−25.8%	−72.6 pts	−110.8 pts	−97.6 pts	−135.8 pts
Since launch EVMT Apr 2022 · LITP Feb 2023	−27.4%	−46.8%	−122.1 pts	−138.7 pts	−167.1 pts	−189.2 pts

EVMT and LITP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

EVMT

Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Holds 2 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

LITP

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF · Holds 38 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 10% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Invesco Sprott

Theme Electric vehicles and batteries Lithium and battery metals

In the S&P 500 0.0% 9.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 2 38

Top ten, share of the fund 100.0% 71.2%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.59% 0.65%

Total return, 1 year +20.8% +9.9%

vs the S&P 500 +5.1 pts −5.8 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −3.0 pts −13.8 pts

Below its high −28.6% −49.3%

Net assets $7m $33m

EVMT and LITP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EVMT in plain words

By weight, 0% of EVMT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 2 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.1 pts. It sits 28.6% below its all-time high of Apr 27, 2022.

LITP in plain words

By weight, 10% of LITP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 71% of the fund across 38 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. It sits 49.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do EVMT and LITP hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, EVMT or LITP?: EVMT has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LITP has 10%, so EVMT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, EVMT or LITP?: EVMT charges 0.59% a year and LITP charges 0.65%, so EVMT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

EVMT vs KARS EVMT vs LIMI EVMT vs LIT EVMT vs WATS LITP vs WATS LITP vs FDRV LITP vs HAIL LITP vs IDRV

EVMT on its own →LITP on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

EVMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗EVMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for EVMT ↗LITP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LITP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Sprott page for LITP ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, EVMT against LITP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/evmt-vs-litp

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.