BATT vs LIMI: which is really different?

BATT and LIMI hold 11% of their weight in the same names. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF and Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF.

15.6%
BATT in the S&P 500
7.5%
LIMI in the S&P 500
+12.1%
BATT total return, 1 year
+12.1%
LIMI total return, 1 year
BATT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
84% of its weight is outside the S&P 50016% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index16%84%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 47% of the fund · 57 holdings filed Oct 1, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in84% of its weight is outside the S&P 50016% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index16%84%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 47% of the fund

16% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index

LIMI · 1 year to Sep 25, 202693% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
93% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of LIMI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 93% is outside the index8%93%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 53% of the fund · 41 holdings filed Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in93% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of LIMI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 93% is outside the index8%93%8% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 53% of the fund

8% of LIMI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 93% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · LIMI scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BATT and LIMI hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 1, 2026.

half

11% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BATT LIMI
Albemarle Corp 1.56% 7.46%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 1.44% 1.33%
PLS Group Ltd 1.33% 9.08%
Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt Co Ltd 1.26% 5.35%
Mineral Resources Ltd 1.19% 3.10%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co Ltd 1.18% 3.88%
Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 1.16% 3.44%
Tianqi Lithium Corp 1.13% 5.52%
IGO LTD 1.04% 3.57%
Only in BATT
Tesla Inc 7.73%
BHP Group Ltd 6.90%
Freeport-McMoRan Inc 6.32%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd 5.37%
Bloom Energy Corp 5.25%
BYD Co Ltd 4.47%
Grupo Mexico SAB de CV 3.04%
TDK Corp 2.86%
Only in LIMI
TINCI 7.02%
Liontown Ltd 3.88%
CAPCHEM 3.35%
Lithium Americas Corp 3.16%
Elevra Lithium Ltd 3.11%
Core Lithium Ltd 2.96%
Lithium Argentina AG 2.53%
GEM Co Ltd 2.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

11% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowBATTLIMIBATTLIMIBATTLIMI
3 months−6.7%−15.3%−9.2 pts−21.4 pts−8.8 pts−20.8 pts
6 months−4.9%−16.6%−21.9 pts−38.8 pts−31.8 pts−49.2 pts
1 year+12.1%+12.1%−3.6 pts−6.4 pts−11.7 pts−14.0 pts
3 years+37.5%not published−47.5 ptsnot published−72.5 ptsnot published
Since launch
BATT Jun 2018 · LIMI Sep 2024
−15.2%+62.3%−228.1 pts+24.2 pts−359.8 pts+7.4 pts

BATT and LIMI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF · Holds 57 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
LIMI
Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF · Holds 41 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Amplify Themes
Theme Lithium and battery metals Lithium and battery metals
In the S&P 500 15.6% 7.5%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.0% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 7.7% 0.0%
Holdings 57 41
Top ten, share of the fund 47.1% 52.6%
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.35%
Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.35%
Total return, 1 year +12.1% +12.1%
vs the S&P 500 −3.6 pts −6.4 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −11.7 pts −14.0 pts
Below its high −20.7% −36.3%
Net assets $112m $2m

BATT and LIMI on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BATT in plain words

By weight, 16% of BATT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. It sits 20.7% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

LIMI in plain words

By weight, 8% of LIMI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 41 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested against +18.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 6.4 pts. It sits 36.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BATT and LIMI hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or LIMI?
BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LIMI has 8%, so LIMI differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BATT or LIMI?
BATT charges 0.59% a year and LIMI charges 0.35%, so LIMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, BATT against LIMI, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/batt-vs-limi

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.