ILIT vs ION: which is really different?

ILIT and ION hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and ION returned +18.9% over the year. iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF and ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF.

7.9%
ILIT in the S&P 500
2.6%
ION in the S&P 500
+7.0%
ILIT total return, 1 year
+18.9%
ION total return, 1 year
ILIT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202692% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
92% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of ILIT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index8%92%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 53% of the fund · 62 holdings filed Sep 29, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in92% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of ILIT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index8%92%8% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 53% of the fund

8% of ILIT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index

ION · 1 year to Sep 30, 202697% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
97% of its weight is outside the S&P 5003% of ION's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 97% is outside the index3%97%3% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 33% of the fund · 53 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in97% of its weight is outside the S&P 5003% of ION's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 97% is outside the index3%97%3% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 33% of the fund

3% of ION's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 97% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · ILIT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILIT and ION hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

20% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ILIT ION
SIGMA LITHIUM 3.11% 3.19%
PLS GROUP LTD 6.91% 2.90%
SOCIEDAD QUIMICA Y MINERA DE CHILE 8.15% 2.88%
ALBEMARLE CORP 7.88% 2.62%
LIONTOWN LTD 7.07% 2.39%
ELEVRA LITHIUM LTD 3.74% 2.27%
Only in ILIT
LITHIUM AMERICAS 4.73%
COSMOAM&T LTD 3.93%
LITHIUM ARGENTINA AG 3.69%
CORE LITHIUM LTD 3.59%
GANFENG LITHIUM GROUP LTD A 3.11%
PMET RESOURCES INC 2.92%
CRITICAL METALS CORP 2.83%
GUANGZHOU TINCI MATERIALS TECHNOLO 2.82%
Only in ION
PACIFIC METALS CO LTD 5.04%
IGO LTD 3.74%
PT TIMAH (PERSERO) TBK 3.55%
VALE INDONESIA TBK 3.39%
ERAMET 2.93%
TIBET MINERAL DEVELOPMENT-A 2.93%
AFRICAN RAINBOW MINERALS LTD 2.88%
ANTAM PERSERO TBK PT 2.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

20% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowILITIONILITIONILITION
3 months−27.4%−10.4%−29.9 pts−12.9 pts−29.5 pts−12.5 pts
6 months−26.2%−19.6%−43.2 pts−36.6 pts−53.1 pts−46.5 pts
1 year+7.0%+18.9%−8.7 pts+3.1 pts−16.7 pts−4.9 pts
3 years−24.5%+48.5%−109.5 pts−36.5 pts−134.5 pts−61.5 pts
Since launch
ILIT Jun 2023 · ION Dec 2022
−42.3%+16.1%−125.5 pts−81.1 pts−150.1 pts−141.7 pts

ILIT and ION over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF · Holds 62 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
ION
ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF · Holds 53 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 3% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer iShares ProShares
Theme Lithium and battery metals Lithium and battery metals
In the S&P 500 7.9% 2.6%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 62 53
Top ten, share of the fund 52.8% 33.4%
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.58%
Fee for the differing part 0.47% 0.58%
Total return, 1 year +7.0% +18.9%
vs the S&P 500 −8.7 pts +3.1 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −16.7 pts −4.9 pts
Below its high −46.7% −32.9%
Net assets $13m $12m

ILIT and ION on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ILIT in plain words

By weight, 8% of ILIT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 62 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 29, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 8.7 pts. It sits 46.7% below its all-time high of Jul 13, 2023.

ION in plain words

By weight, 3% of ION's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 53 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 3.1 pts. It sits 32.9% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ILIT and ION hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ILIT or ION?
ILIT has 8% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ION has 3%, so ILIT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ILIT or ION?
ILIT charges 0.47% a year and ION charges 0.58%, so ILIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ILIT against ION, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ilit-vs-ion

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.