MSTC vs MSTP: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, MSTC finished 6.7 points from its stated multiple and MSTP 9.7. Corgi MSTR 2x Daily ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF.

+121.2%
MSTC returned, 3 months
+118.2%
MSTP returned, 3 months
−6.7 pts
MSTC from its stated multiple
−9.7 pts
MSTP from its stated multiple
MSTC · 3 months to Sep 30, 20266.7 pts short of its stated multiple
6.7 pts short of its stated multipleMSTC returned +121.2% while 2 times MSTR's move would have been +127.9%MSTR +63.9% ×2 implies+127.9%MSTC returned+121.2%6.7 pts short of its stated multipleMSTC returned +121.2% while 2 times MSTR's move would have been +127.9%MSTR +63.9% ×2 implies+127.9%MSTC returned+121.2%

MSTC returned +121.2% while 2 times MSTR's move would have been +127.9%

MSTP · 3 months to Sep 30, 20269.7 pts short of its stated multiple
9.7 pts short of its stated multipleMSTP returned +118.2% while 2 times MSTR's move would have been +127.9%MSTR +63.9% ×2 implies+127.9%MSTP returned+118.2%9.7 pts short of its stated multipleMSTP returned +118.2% while 2 times MSTR's move would have been +127.9%MSTR +63.9% ×2 implies+127.9%MSTP returned+118.2%

MSTP returned +118.2% while 2 times MSTR's move would have been +127.9%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · MSTC scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowMSTCMSTPMSTCMSTPMSTCMSTP
1 month+22.5%+21.7%+30.3%+30.3%−7.8 pts−8.6 pts
3 months+121.2%+118.2%+127.9%+127.9%−6.7 pts−9.7 pts
6 monthsnot published+0.7%not published+49.4%not published−48.7 pts
1 yearnot published−90.4%not published−105.0%not published+14.6 pts
Since launch
MSTC Jun 2026 · MSTP Jun 2025
+155.3%−94.3%+152.2%−121.7%+3.1 pts+27.4 pts

MSTC and MSTP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

MSTC
Corgi MSTR 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Strategy (MSTR)
MSTP
GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Strategy (MSTR)
Issuer Corgi GraniteShares
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset MSTR MSTR
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +121.2% +118.2%
Underlying returned, over that window +63.9% +63.9%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +127.9% +127.9%
Difference from stated, over that window −6.7 pts −9.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +155.3% −90.4%
Difference from stated, over that window +3.1 pts +14.6 pts
Underlying volatility 83% 83%
Difference over the days both have traded −6.7 pts −9.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.45% 1.50%
Launched Jun 30, 2026 Jun 10, 2025
Net assets $1m $16m

MSTC and MSTP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MSTC in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MSTC returned +121.2% where its own daily promise gave +130.0%, 8.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times MSTR's 63.9% implies +127.9%, which makes MSTC look 6.7 points short. 2.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MSTC aims to return +2 times MSTR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MSTR moved at 83% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MSTP in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MSTP returned +118.2% where its own daily promise gave +130.0%, 11.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times MSTR's 63.9% implies +127.9%, which makes MSTP look 9.7 points short. MSTP aims to return +2 times MSTR's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MSTC or MSTP?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, MSTC finished 6.7 points from what its multiple implies and MSTP finished 9.7 points from its own, so MSTC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MSTC and MSTP levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Strategy, MSTC at +2 times and MSTP at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MSTC or MSTP?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MSTC’s moved at 83% annualized and MSTP’s at 83%, so MSTC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MSTC or MSTP for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, MSTC or MSTP?
MSTC charges 0.45% a year and MSTP charges 1.50%, so MSTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, MSTC against MSTP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/mstc-vs-mstp

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.