Which came closer to its stated multiple, MSTC or MSTZ?

Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, MSTC finished 6.7 points from what its multiple implies and MSTZ finished 48.5 points from its own, so MSTC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are MSTC and MSTZ levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on Strategy, MSTC at +2 times and MSTZ at -2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, MSTC or MSTZ?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MSTC’s moved at 83% annualized and MSTZ’s at 83%, so MSTC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold MSTC or MSTZ for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Which is cheaper, MSTC or MSTZ?

MSTC charges 0.45% a year and MSTZ charges 1.05%, so MSTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

MSTC vs MSTZ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, MSTC finished 8.9 points short and MSTZ 0.1 points short. Corgi MSTR 2x Daily ETF and T-REX 2X INVERSE MSTR DAILY TARGET ETF.

+121.2%

MSTC returned, 3 months

−79.3%

MSTZ returned, 3 months

−6.7 pts

MSTC from its stated multiple

+48.5 pts

MSTZ from its stated multiple

MSTC · 3 months to Sep 30, 20266.7 pts short of its stated multiple

MSTC returned +121.2% while 2 times MSTR's move would have been +127.9%

MSTZ · 3 months to Sep 30, 202648.5 pts ahead of its stated multiple

MSTZ returned −79.3% while −2 times MSTR's move would have been −127.9%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · MSTZ scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

MSTC among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

MSTC 3.1

0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

MSTZ among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months

MSTZ 14.8

0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. MSTZ is a percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	MSTC	MSTZ	MSTC	MSTZ	MSTC	MSTZ
1 month	+22.5%	−43.5%	+30.3%	−30.3%	−7.8 pts	−13.2 pts
3 months	+121.2%	−79.3%	+127.9%	−127.9%	−6.7 pts	+48.5 pts
6 months	not published	−78.7%	not published	−49.4%	not published	−29.4 pts
1 year	not published	−47.9%	not published	+105.0%	not published	−152.9 pts
Since launch MSTC Jun 2026 · MSTZ Sep 2024	+155.3%	−99.4%	+152.2%	−30.8%	+3.1 pts	−68.7 pts

MSTC and MSTZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

MSTC

Corgi MSTR 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Strategy (MSTR)

MSTZ

T-REX 2X INVERSE MSTR DAILY TARGET ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Strategy (MSTR)

Issuer Corgi T-REX

Sets out to return +2x -2x

Underlying asset MSTR MSTR

Segment company company

Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +121.2% −79.3%

Underlying returned, over that window +63.9% +63.9%

What the stated multiple implies, over that window +127.9% −127.9%

Difference from stated, over that window −6.7 pts +48.5 pts

Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +155.3% −47.9%

Difference from stated, over that window +3.1 pts −152.9 pts

Underlying volatility 83% 83%

Difference over the days both have traded −6.7 pts +48.5 pts

Expense ratio 0.45% 1.05%

Launched Jun 30, 2026 Sep 18, 2024

Net assets $1m $99m

MSTC and MSTZ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MSTC in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MSTC returned +121.2% where its own daily promise gave +130.0%, 8.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times MSTR's 63.9% implies +127.9%, which makes MSTC look 6.7 points short. 2.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MSTC aims to return +2 times MSTR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MSTR moved at 83% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MSTZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MSTZ returned −79.3% where its own daily promise gave −79.2%, 0.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times MSTR's 63.9% implies −127.9%, which makes MSTZ look 48.5 points over. 48.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MSTZ aims to return -2 times MSTR's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MSTC or MSTZ?: Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, MSTC finished 6.7 points from what its multiple implies and MSTZ finished 48.5 points from its own, so MSTC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MSTC and MSTZ levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on Strategy, MSTC at +2 times and MSTZ at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MSTC or MSTZ?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MSTC’s moved at 83% annualized and MSTZ’s at 83%, so MSTC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MSTC or MSTZ for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, MSTC or MSTZ?: MSTC charges 0.45% a year and MSTZ charges 1.05%, so MSTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

MSTC vs MSTP MSTC vs MSTU MSTC vs MSTX MSTC vs SMST MSTZ vs SMST MSTZ vs MSTP MSTZ vs MSTU MSTZ vs MSTX

MSTC on its own →MSTZ on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

MSTC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗MSTC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Corgi website ↗MSTZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗MSTZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗T-REX page for MSTZ ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, MSTC against MSTZ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/mstc-vs-mstz

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.