Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TYLG vs XLBI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XLBI paid 14.5% of its price in cash against TYLG’s 10.3%, though TYLG returned more with it reinvested.

Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

10.3%TYLG cash paid, 1 year
14.5%XLBI cash paid, 1 year
+32.9%TYLG total return, 1 year
+8.8%XLBI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: TYLG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

TYLG 71.9XLBI 43.23.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TYLG5.2 pts behind XLK · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLK+38.0%TYLG+32.9%10.3% as cash5.2 pts behind XLKTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLK+38.0%TYLG+32.9%5.2 pts behind XLK
XLBI3.2 pts behind XLB · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLB+12.0%XLBI+8.8%14.5% as cash3.2 pts behind XLBTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLB+12.0%XLBI+8.8%3.2 pts behind XLB

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, TYLG and XLBI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in TYLGOnly in XLBI
STATE STREET TECHNOLOGY SELECT SECTOR SPDR ETF 54.45%STATE STREET MATERIALS SELECT 100.35%
NVIDIA CORP 7.30%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.40%
APPLE INC 6.66%STATE STREET MATERIALS SELECT OCT26 52 CALL -0.75%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.98%
BROADCOM INC 2.30%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.24%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.06%
INTEL CORP 1.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

TYLG and XLBI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
TYLGXLBITYLGXLBITYLGXLBI
3 months+2.0%−0.7%2.4%3.3%+2.9 pts+2.4 pts
6 months+29.6%+11.1%5.7%7.2%−10.8 pts+3.9 pts
1 year+32.9%+8.8%10.3%14.5%−5.2 pts−3.2 pts
3 years+95.0%not published34.2%not published−33.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+141.1%+12.1%45.8%16.3%−51.3 pts−2.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TYLG and XLBI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TYLG
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on XLK, paying monthly
XLBI
State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLB, paying monthly
IssuerGlobal XState Street
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkTechnology sector (XLK)Materials (XLB)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized7.8%11.5%
Expense ratio0.60%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year10.3%14.5%
Price change, 1 year+20.6%−6.3%
Total return, 1 year+32.9%+8.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+38.0%+12.0%
Ahead or behind−5.2 pts−3.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age1396 days415 days
Net assets$15m$8m

TYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TYLG paid 10.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 20.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.9%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XLBI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLBI paid 14.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Materials (XLB) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, TYLG or XLBI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TYLG paid 10.3% of its starting price in cash and XLBI paid 14.5%, so XLBI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, TYLG or XLBI?
With every distribution reinvested, TYLG returned +32.9% and XLBI returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so TYLG returned more.
Which is cheaper, TYLG or XLBI?
TYLG charges 0.60% a year and XLBI charges 0.35%, so XLBI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TYLG against XLBI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TYLG against XLBI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tylg-vs-xlbi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources