Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

XLBI vs XLSI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XLBI paid 14.5% of its price in cash against XLSI’s 11.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

14.5%XLBI cash paid, 1 year
11.8%XLSI cash paid, 1 year
+8.8%XLBI total return, 1 year
+5.5%XLSI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLSI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

XLBI 43.2XLSI 67.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

XLBI3.2 pts behind XLB · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLB+12.0%XLBI+8.8%14.5% of it arrived as cash3.2 pts behind XLBTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLB+12.0%XLBI+8.8%3.2 pts behind XLB
XLSI12.5 pts ahead of XLY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLY−6.9%XLSI+5.5%11.8% as cash12.5 pts ahead of XLYTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLY−6.9%XLSI+5.5%12.5 pts ahead of XLY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, XLBI and XLSI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions XLBI and XLSI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingXLBIXLSI
SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS0.40%0.83%
Only in each
Only in XLBIOnly in XLSI
STATE STREET MATERIALS SELECT 100.35%STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES 99.58%
STATE STREET MATERIALS SELECT OCT26 52 CALL -0.75%STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 86 CALL -0.10%
STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 85 CALL -0.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

XLBI and XLSI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
XLBIXLSIXLBIXLSIXLBIXLSI
3 months−0.7%+1.2%3.3%3.1%+2.4 pts+6.3 pts
6 months+11.1%+4.9%7.2%6.2%+3.9 pts+1.4 pts
1 year+8.8%+5.5%14.5%11.8%−3.2 pts+12.5 pts
Since launch+12.1%+4.8%16.3%12.7%−2.4 pts+4.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
XLBI and XLSI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XLBI
State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLB, paying monthly
XLSI
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLY, paying monthly
IssuerState StreetState Street
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkMaterials (XLB)Consumer discretionary (XLY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized11.5%9.3%
Expense ratio0.35%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year14.5%11.8%
Price change, 1 year−6.3%−6.5%
Total return, 1 year+8.8%+5.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+12.0%−6.9%
Ahead or behind−3.2 pts+12.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age415 days415 days
Net assets$8m$20m

XLBI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLBI paid 14.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Materials (XLB) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly.

XLSI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLSI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. Consumer discretionary (XLY) returned −6.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 12.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, XLBI or XLSI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLBI paid 14.5% of its starting price in cash and XLSI paid 11.8%, so XLBI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, XLBI or XLSI?
With every distribution reinvested, XLBI returned +8.8% and XLSI returned +5.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XLBI returned more.
Which is cheaper, XLBI or XLSI?
XLBI charges 0.35% a year and XLSI charges 0.35%, so XLBI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

XLBI against XLSI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, XLBI against XLSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xlbi-vs-xlsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources