Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GPTY vs XLSI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year GPTY paid 34.0% of its price in cash against XLSI’s 11.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

34.0%GPTY cash paid, 1 year
11.8%XLSI cash paid, 1 year
+32.4%GPTY total return, 1 year
+5.5%XLSI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLSI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

GPTY 37.6XLSI 67.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

GPTY5.7 pts behind XLK · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLK+38.0%GPTY+32.4%34.0% of it arrived as cash5.7 pts behind XLKTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLK+38.0%GPTY+32.4%34.0% as cash5.7 pts behind XLK
XLSI12.5 pts ahead of XLY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLY−6.9%XLSI+5.5%12.5 pts ahead of XLYTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLY−6.9%XLSI+5.5%12.5 pts ahead of XLY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GPTY and XLSI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in GPTYOnly in XLSI
Intel Corp 9.47%STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES 99.85%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 6.95%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.75%
Alphabet Inc 6.81%US DOLLAR 0.07%
NVIDIA Corp 6.73%STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 86 C -0.17%
Marvell Technology Inc 5.60%STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 85 C -0.50%
TSMC 5.52%
Broadcom Inc 4.82%
Palantir Technologies Inc 4.37%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 17, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GPTY and XLSI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GPTYXLSIGPTYXLSIGPTYXLSI
3 months−1.3%+1.2%8.2%3.1%−0.5 pts+6.3 pts
6 months+40.4%+4.9%22.2%6.2%−0.1 pts+1.4 pts
1 year+32.4%+5.5%34.0%11.8%−5.7 pts+12.5 pts
Since launch+53.2%+4.8%51.0%12.7%−4.9 pts+4.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GPTY and XLSI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GPTY
YieldMax(R) AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on XLK, paying weekly
XLSI
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLY, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxState Street
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkTechnology sector (XLK)Consumer discretionary (XLY)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized35.3%9.3%
Expense ratio1.06%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year34.0%11.8%
Price change, 1 year−8.1%−6.5%
Total return, 1 year+32.4%+5.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+38.0%−6.9%
Ahead or behind−5.7 pts+12.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate94%not published
Age603 days415 days
Net assets$126m$18m

GPTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPTY paid 34.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.4%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 35.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XLSI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLSI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. Consumer discretionary (XLY) returned −6.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 12.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPTY or XLSI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPTY paid 34.0% of its starting price in cash and XLSI paid 11.8%, so GPTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPTY or XLSI?
With every distribution reinvested, GPTY returned +32.4% and XLSI returned +5.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so GPTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, GPTY or XLSI?
GPTY charges 1.06% a year and XLSI charges 0.35%, so XLSI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GPTY against XLSI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPTY against XLSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpty-vs-xlsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources