Data as of .
GPTY vs MLPD: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year GPTY paid 34.0% of its price in cash against MLPD’s 13.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GPTY scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPTY and MLPD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GPTY | Only in MLPD |
|---|---|
| Intel Corp 9.47% | GLOBAL X MLP & ENERGY INFRAS 102.10% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 6.95% | CASH 1.05% |
| Alphabet Inc 6.81% | OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -1.02% |
| NVIDIA Corp 6.73% | 2MLPX US 10/16/2026 C74 -2.13% |
| Marvell Technology Inc 5.60% | |
| TSMC 5.52% | |
| Broadcom Inc 4.82% | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc 4.37% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPTY | MLPD | GPTY | MLPD | GPTY | MLPD | |
| 3 months | −1.3% | +4.2% | 8.2% | 3.0% | −0.5 pts | −16.2 pts |
| 6 months | +40.4% | +4.1% | 22.2% | 5.7% | −0.1 pts | −5.8 pts |
| 1 year | +32.4% | +12.0% | 34.0% | 13.3% | −5.7 pts | −35.8 pts |
| Since launch | +53.2% | +33.5% | 51.0% | 28.2% | −4.9 pts | −14.7 pts |
| GPTY YieldMax(R) AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF Synthetic covered call on XLK, paying weekly | MLPD Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF Covered call on XLE, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Global X |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Technology sector (XLK) | Energy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 35.3% | 12.0% |
| Expense ratio | 1.06% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 34.0% | 13.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | −8.1% | −2.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.4% | +12.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +38.0% | +47.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.7 pts | −35.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 94% | 0% |
| Age | 603 days | 863 days |
| Net assets | $126m | $27m |
GPTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPTY paid 34.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.4%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 35.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
MLPD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MLPD paid 13.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.0%. Energy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy returned +47.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 35.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPTY or MLPD?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPTY paid 34.0% of its starting price in cash and MLPD paid 13.3%, so GPTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPTY or MLPD?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPTY returned +32.4% and MLPD returned +12.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so GPTY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, GPTY or MLPD?
- GPTY charges 1.06% a year and MLPD charges 0.60%, so MLPD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPTY against MLPD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpty-vs-mlpd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.