Which paid more, TYLG or XLII?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TYLG paid 10.2% of its starting price in cash and XLII paid 13.3%, so XLII paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, TYLG or XLII?

With every distribution reinvested, TYLG returned +20.4% and XLII +11.4% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, TYLG or XLII?

TYLG charges 0.60% a year and XLII charges 0.35%, so XLII is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

TYLG vs XLII: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XLII paid 13.3% of its price in cash against TYLG’s 10.2%, though TYLG returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TYLG and XLII

Net assets: $17m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF, and $18m on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF.

TYLG on its own →XLII on its own →

At a glance

10.2%

TYLG cash paid, 1 year

13.3%

XLII cash paid, 1 year

+20.4%

TYLG total return, 1 year

+11.4%

XLII total return, 1 year

TYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured

TYLG

+20.4%

none

Not measured

TYLG over 1 year: paid 10.2%, price +9.3%, total +20.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

TYLG

+20.4%

10.2% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

TYLG over 1 year: paid 10.2%, price +9.3%, total +20.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

TYLG

+20.4%

10.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. TYLG over 1 year: paid 10.2%, price +9.3%, total +20.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

XLII · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 0.9 pts behind XLI

XLII

+11.4%

XLI

+12.3%

0.9 pts behind XLI

XLII over 1 year: paid 13.3%, price −2.1%, total +11.4%, XLI +12.3%, −0.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

XLI

+12.3%

XLII

+11.4%

13.3% of it arrived as cash

0.9 pts behind XLI

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.9 pts behind XLI

XLII over 1 year: paid 13.3%, price −2.1%, total +11.4%, XLI +12.3%, −0.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

XLI

+12.3%

XLII

+11.4%

13.3% cash

0.9 pts behind XLI

13.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XLII over 1 year: paid 13.3%, price −2.1%, total +11.4%, XLI +12.3%, −0.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

XLII costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.0 points; TYLG is 1.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

TYLG vs XLII: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	TYLG	XLII
Paid and earned
Measure	TYLG	XLII
Total return, 1 year	+20.4%	+11.4%
Price change, 1 year	rose 9.3%	fell 2.1%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment	100% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	TYLG	XLII
Benchmark	not published	Industrials, measured through XLI
Cost and size
Measure	TYLG	XLII
Expense ratio	0.60%	0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$17m	$16m
Holdings
Measure	TYLG	XLII
Holdings in common	0%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, TYLG and XLII hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TYLG XLII

Only in one fund ↓

Only in TYLG

THE SELECT SECTOR SPDR TRUST - The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund 54.55%

NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.51%

APPLE INC. 6.07%

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.62%

BROADCOM INC. 2.46%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 1.97%

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.70%

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.49%

Only in XLII

STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT 101.40%

STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT NOV26 171 CALL -0.00%

STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT NOV26 174 CALL -0.04%

STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT NOV26 173 CALL -0.07%

STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT NOV26 172 CALL -1.81%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call, paying monthly XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF · Covered call on XLI, paying monthly

Issuer Global X State Street

Strategy covered call covered call

Benchmark none Industrials (XLI)

Pays monthly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 11.9% 15.0%

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.35%

Cash paid, 1 year 10.2% 13.3%

Price change, 1 year +9.3% −2.1%

Total return, 1 year +20.4% +11.4%

Benchmark return, 1 year not published +12.3%

Ahead or behind not available −0.9 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 100%

Age 4.0 years 1.3 years

Net assets, TYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 and XLII as of Nov 3, 2026 $17m $18m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: TYLG vs XLII: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	TYLG	XLII	TYLG	XLII	TYLG	XLII
3 months	−1.2%	−6.2%	2.3%	2.7%	not measured	+2.6 pts
6 months	+6.1%	+1.1%	5.3%	6.4%	not measured	+4.8 pts
1 year	+20.4%	+11.4%	10.2%	13.3%	not measured	−0.9 pts
3 years	+82.8%	–	35.5%	–	not measured	–
Since launchNot the same days: TYLG Nov 2022 · XLII Jul 2025	+130.4%	+15.0%	48.5%	16.8%	not measured	+1.8 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

TYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TYLG paid 10.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.4%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

XLII

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XLII paid 13.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.4%. Industrials (XLI) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. State Street estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, TYLG or XLII?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TYLG paid 10.2% of its starting price in cash and XLII paid 13.3%, so XLII paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, TYLG or XLII?: With every distribution reinvested, TYLG returned +20.4% and XLII +11.4% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, TYLG or XLII?: TYLG charges 0.60% a year and XLII charges 0.35%, so XLII is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

TYLG vs XLFI TYLG vs XLKI TYLG vs WEPN TYLG vs XLCI XLII vs XLSI XLII vs XLVI XLII vs YRAM XLII vs XLYI

Where to next

Industrials (XLI) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →TYLG on its own →XLII on its own →TYLG dividend history →TYLG holdings →XLII dividend history →XLII holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

TYLG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

TYLG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

TYLG 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Global X page for TYLG ↗

XLII filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XLII prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

XLII 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

State Street website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TYLG against XLII, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tylg-vs-xlii

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.