Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

XLBI vs XLVI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XLBI paid 14.5% of its price in cash against XLVI’s 13.0%, though XLVI returned more with it reinvested.

State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

14.5%XLBI cash paid, 1 year
13.0%XLVI cash paid, 1 year
+8.8%XLBI total return, 1 year
+17.9%XLVI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLVI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

XLBI 43.2XLVI 57.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

XLBI3.2 pts behind XLB · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLB+12.0%XLBI+8.8%14.5% of it arrived as cash3.2 pts behind XLBTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLB+12.0%XLBI+8.8%3.2 pts behind XLB
XLVI6.7 pts behind XLV · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLV+24.6%XLVI+17.9%13.0% of it arrived as cash6.7 pts behind XLVTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLV+24.6%XLVI+17.9%6.7 pts behind XLV

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, XLBI and XLVI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions XLBI and XLVI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingXLBIXLVI
SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS0.40%0.40%
Only in each
Only in XLBIOnly in XLVI
STATE STREET MATERIALS SELECT 100.35%STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC 100.46%
STATE STREET MATERIALS SELECT OCT26 52 CALL -0.75%STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC OCT26 173 CALL -0.02%
STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC OCT26 170 CALL -0.04%
STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC OCT26 172 CALL -0.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

XLBI and XLVI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
XLBIXLVIXLBIXLVIXLBIXLVI
3 months−0.7%+6.9%3.3%3.1%+2.4 pts−6.3 pts
6 months+11.1%+12.2%7.2%6.4%+3.9 pts−4.6 pts
1 year+8.8%+17.9%14.5%13.0%−3.2 pts−6.7 pts
Since launch+12.1%+21.1%16.3%14.7%−2.4 pts−6.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
XLBI and XLVI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XLBI
State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLB, paying monthly
XLVI
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLV, paying monthly
IssuerState StreetState Street
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkMaterials (XLB)Health care sector (XLV)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized11.5%13.1%
Expense ratio0.35%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year14.5%13.0%
Price change, 1 year−6.3%+4.0%
Total return, 1 year+8.8%+17.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+12.0%+24.6%
Ahead or behind−3.2 pts−6.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age415 days415 days
Net assets$8m$27m

XLBI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLBI paid 14.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Materials (XLB) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly.

XLVI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLVI paid 13.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. Health care sector (XLV) returned +24.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, XLBI or XLVI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLBI paid 14.5% of its starting price in cash and XLVI paid 13.0%, so XLBI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, XLBI or XLVI?
With every distribution reinvested, XLBI returned +8.8% and XLVI returned +17.9% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XLVI returned more.
Which is cheaper, XLBI or XLVI?
XLBI charges 0.35% a year and XLVI charges 0.35%, so XLBI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

XLBI against XLVI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, XLBI against XLVI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xlbi-vs-xlvi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources