Data as of .
HAKY vs TYLG: which paid, and which earned it?
HAKY and TYLG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HAKY and TYLG hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | HAKY | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc | 5.12% | 2.30% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 5.35% | 1.18% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 8.56% | 0.81% |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 9.19% | 0.66% |
| Fortinet Inc | 6.55% | 0.28% |
| F5 Inc | 4.30% | 0.07% |
| GEN DIGITAL INC | 3.53% | 0.05% |
| Only in HAKY | Only in TYLG |
|---|---|
| Okta Inc 6.69% | STATE STREET TECHNOLOGY SELECT SECTOR SPDR ETF 54.45% |
| Cloudflare Inc 5.55% | NVIDIA CORP 7.30% |
| Rubrik Inc 5.43% | APPLE INC 6.66% |
| Qualys Inc 4.62% | MICROSOFT CORP 4.98% |
| Varonis Systems Inc 4.58% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.24% |
| Tenable Holdings Inc 4.29% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.06% |
| SentinelOne Inc 4.26% | INTEL CORP 1.48% |
| Zscaler Inc 3.81% | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A 1.12% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAKY | TYLG | HAKY | TYLG | HAKY | TYLG | |
| 3 months | +18.3% | +2.0% | 4.5% | 2.4% | −5.3 pts | +2.9 pts |
| 6 months | +43.3% | +29.6% | 10.1% | 5.7% | −11.8 pts | −10.8 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +32.9% | not published | 10.3% | not published | −5.2 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +95.0% | not published | 34.2% | not published | −33.0 pts |
| Since launch | +39.2% | +141.1% | 11.0% | 45.8% | −13.9 pts | −51.3 pts |
| HAKY Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF Covered call on HACK, paying monthly | TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on XLK, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Cybersecurity (HACK) | Technology sector (XLK) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 7.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.0% (since launch on Jan 21, 2026) | 10.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | +25.5% | +20.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +39.2% (since launch on Jan 21, 2026) | +32.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +53.1% | +38.0% |
| Ahead or behind | −13.9 pts | −5.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 240 days | 1396 days |
| Net assets | $8m | $15m |
HAKY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, HAKY paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 25.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +39.2%. Cybersecurity (HACK) returned +53.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
TYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TYLG paid 10.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 20.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.9%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, HAKY or TYLG?
- HAKY charges 0.65% a year and TYLG charges 0.60%, so TYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HAKY against TYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/haky-vs-tylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.