Data as of .
TYLG vs XLVI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XLVI paid 13.0% of its price in cash against TYLG’s 10.3%, though TYLG returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: TYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, TYLG and XLVI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in TYLG | Only in XLVI |
|---|---|
| STATE STREET TECHNOLOGY SELECT SECTOR SP 54.45% | STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC 100.60% |
| NVIDIA CORP 7.30% | SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.40% |
| APPLE INC 6.66% | STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC OCT26 173 -0.02% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 4.98% | STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC OCT26 170 -0.04% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.30% | STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC OCT26 172 -0.93% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.24% | |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.06% | |
| INTEL CORP 1.48% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 17, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYLG | XLVI | TYLG | XLVI | TYLG | XLVI | |
| 3 months | +2.0% | +6.9% | 2.4% | 3.1% | +2.9 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 6 months | +29.6% | +12.2% | 5.7% | 6.4% | −10.8 pts | −4.6 pts |
| 1 year | +32.9% | +17.9% | 10.3% | 13.0% | −5.2 pts | −6.7 pts |
| 3 years | +95.0% | not published | 34.2% | not published | −33.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +141.1% | +21.1% | 45.8% | 14.7% | −51.3 pts | −6.5 pts |
| TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on XLK, paying monthly | XLVI State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF Covered call on XLV, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | State Street |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Technology sector (XLK) | Health care sector (XLV) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 7.8% | 13.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 10.3% | 13.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | +20.6% | +4.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.9% | +17.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +38.0% | +24.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.2 pts | −6.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | not published |
| Age | 1396 days | 415 days |
| Net assets | $15m | $27m |
TYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TYLG paid 10.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 20.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.9%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XLVI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLVI paid 13.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. Health care sector (XLV) returned +24.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, TYLG or XLVI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TYLG paid 10.3% of its starting price in cash and XLVI paid 13.0%, so XLVI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, TYLG or XLVI?
- With every distribution reinvested, TYLG returned +32.9% and XLVI returned +17.9% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so TYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, TYLG or XLVI?
- TYLG charges 0.60% a year and XLVI charges 0.35%, so XLVI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TYLG against XLVI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tylg-vs-xlvi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.